Cavsfan161
Towel Waver
- Joined
- May 29, 2014
- Messages
- 535
- Reaction score
- 142
- Points
- 43
Looks like bulls could be trading for Kevin Martin.
Looks like bulls could be trading for Kevin Martin.
He will help scoring bit they won't want him and Pau on same court for long periods.Bulls are so shit in trade rumors they can only trade with another team with shit trade rumors, the Lakers
Dunleavy + Snell for K Mart are you shitting me?
Nice.Amundsen will be joining the cavaliers via his agent Mark bartelstein. Just thought I'd tell everyone
Haywood is not worth 10 mill in trade value until next summer. Poor job by the ABJ, (especially since they are now charging for access to coverage)According to Ohio.com, the Cavs are now weighing the possibilities of using Brendan Haywood’s $10.5 million contract and those of several other nonguaranteed players in a play for Roy Hibbert, who reports are the Indiana Pacers are leery of paying $15.5 million to next season in the wake of Paul George almost certainly being sidelined for the entire season.
If the Hibbert talks should fizzle out, the Cavs are also reported to hold a genuine interest in the rugged Larry Sanders. Coming off a season where he played in just 23 games for the Bucks due to torn ligament in his thumb, Sanders will be entering the first year of a four-year, $44 million deal. In his last full NBA season, Sanders ranked third in the league in blocks, behind Hibbert and the Thunder’s Serge Ibaka.
http://triangleoffense.com/news/cle...oy-hibbert-or-larry-sanders-as-rim-protector/
Haywood is not worth 10 mill in trade value until next summer. Poor job by the ABJ, (especially since they are now charging for access to coverage)
It is not a poor job by the ABJ; it is a bad job of triangleoffense.com translating what Lloyd reported. Lloyd was speculating on what the Cavs might do for 2015 (after Haywood's contract accrues in value), and triangleoffense neglected to mention that part.
Also, both items were published a month ago. There is no new news here.
--
This is an excerpt from what the ABJ published on Aug. 24
(http://enjoy.ohio.com/jason-lloyd-c...e-cusp-of-building-a-new-nba-dynasty-1.516200)
Remember the unique Brendan Haywood nonguaranteed contract, worth $10.5 million for the 2015-16 season, that the Cavs acquired on draft night? At the time, it was viewed as a shrewd maneuver aimed at adding a high-priced veteran next summer. Now with three stars already in place, it becomes a lavish luxury.
The Cavs still badly need a rim protector, so how would Roy Hibbert or Larry Sanders look playing alongside James and Love in 2015?
Hibbert crumbled last year with the Indiana Pacers, who are now without star Paul George for this season. Hibbert holds a $15.5 million player option for 2015-16, but he’s playing for a historically tight-fisted franchise that has never entered the luxury tax and has no intention of starting now.
The Cavs could take the Haywood contract, cobble together smaller nonguaranteed deals and easily make the money portion match in a deal for a 7-foot former All-Star.
Sanders, meanwhile, is beginning a four-year, $44 million extension with the Bucks that he signed last summer. He celebrated by getting into a bar fight, tearing a ligament in his thumb and appearing in just 23 games during a miserable season.
Sanders ranked third in the league in blocks two years ago (behind Hibbert and Serge Ibaka) and if he returns to form this year. there shouldn’t be an issue. But if he struggles to live up to the contract, how will a new ownership group in Milwaukee — which wasn’t around when the deal was agreed upon — feel about paying him that much money on a rebuilding team?
I took the poster at his word that it came from the ABJ, so there is alot of blame to go around.
Not a huge trade to get angry about, but I would be a bit disappointed if we just cut all 3 Utah players.
My post was meant as clarification, not blame (except towards triangleoffense, which deserves it).
Me too.
----
On another note: