I said that I understood what he was trying to say. I've got no problem if he's not best buddies with his teammates and posted the link to the whole article expecting you guys would read it. I don't think the full quote really makes a difference to be honest. I never said he didn't like his teammates. But it's still something you shouldn't say if you don't want to bring up controversy from the media. Just leave it alone because it's not like it's going to help anything because like it or not, he's still picking and choosing certain guys over the others.
I said "there's nothing wrong if it's true," meaning I agree he doesn't have to be best buddies with the guys on the court. But like you said we saw what happened with the media and Kyrie and Dion late last year when we were trying to make a playoff push and how it affected the guys, so it's just something you should leave alone because all a quote like that will do is make things worse for chemistry, not improve anything.
The article sucks. The title makes no sense. He rehashes the Instagram photos stuff then explains why the friends thing does not matter (which it doesn't) then literally two sentences later he awkwardly suggests it does.
That was actually an excellent piece of work by Vardon. If I see one more like that out of him, I might actually re-follow him on Twitter.
That show's still on?
We might be too far removed to notice whatever a Spur's player may say and what the media then does, but I'm thinking players on the Spurs pretty much keep their mouths shut at all times via Mr. Head Coach and Sir King of San Antonio, TX. I'd say that's the more plausible reason why the players "seem" to handle the media so well. Also; 15 years ago I lived in San Antonio. Even then Pop was be all end all of all things.
