• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

2014 MLB Predictions

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

How Will the Indians Finish?


  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

Steve_424

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
10,586
Reaction score
13,228
Points
123
I'll kick it off:

AL West - Texas
AL Central - Cleveland
AL East - Tampa Bay
AL Wild Cards - Boston over Detroit

NL West - Los Angeles
NL Central - St. Louis
NL East - Washington
NL Wild Cards - Pittsburgh over San Francisco

ALDS - Cleveland over Texas, Tampa Bay over Boston
ALCS - Tampa Bay over Cleveland
NLDS - Los Angeles over Pittsburgh, St. Louis over Washington
NLCS - Los Angeles over St. Louis

World Series - Los Angeles over Tampa Bay
 
AL West - Los Angeles
AL Central - Cleveland
AL East - Baltimore
AL Wild Cards - Oakland over Boston

NL West - Los Angeles
NL Central - St. Louis
NL East - Atlanta
NL Wild Cards - San Francisco over Milwaukee

ALDS - Cleveland over Los Angeles, Oakland over Baltimore
ALCS - Oakland over Cleveland
NLDS - Los Angeles over St.Louis, Atlanta over San Francisco
NLCS - Atlanta over Los Angeles

World Series - Atlanta over Oakland
 
Ha. No one likes the Yankees, I guess?

AL West - Oakland
AL Central - Detroit
AL East - Boston
AL Wild Cards - Tampa Bay over New York

NL West - Los Angeles
NL Central - St. Louis
NL East - Washington
NL Wild Cards - Arizona over Atlanta

ALDS - Boston over Tampa Bay, Oakland over Detroit
ALCS - Oakland over Cleveland
NLDS - Arizona over Los Angeles, Washington over St. Louis
NLCS - Arizona over Washington

World Series - Boston over Arizona
 
I'll do this after ST when rosters are finalized, injuries are updated, and any final transactions are made.
 
Let me just say this now; we win the ALCS, we will win the World Series. The National League sucks this year.
 
Let me just say this now; we win the ALCS, we will win the World Series. The National League sucks this year.

Los Angeles has a chance to be something special. Very good rotation, very good bullpen, pretty good lineup, and money/prospects to add a guy or two at the deadline. I'd also never discount St. Louis, a team I consider the best in MLB.
 
Don't discount the Nationals, either. Remember they had the best record in baseball two years ago and now have an improved rotation.
 
From Grantland:

<header class="title-card" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px -1.25em -6em -1px; padding: 1em 182px 2em 0px; position: relative; top: -6em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Knockout 31 A', 'Knockout 31 B', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20.799999237060547px;">MLB
[h=1]MLB Over/Under Jamboree[/h]Good news for the Mets? Bad news for the Yankees? The chance to win some Gummi Bears? It must be time for the annual MLB Over/Under report.
BY JONAH KERI ON MARCH 7, 2014

</header>When cranking out baseball betting odds, Vegas and online sportsbooks have always used a combination of rigorous data analysis and information on individuals’ betting habits to ensure that picking winners is a challenge. We laypeople like to think we’re brilliant when we cross-reference the latest PECOTA, ZiPS, and Steamer projections against the prevailing odds. In reality, however, the books are fully aware of every projection system that exists, and probably have their own forecasters pumping out numbers most of us never get to see.


The sharps have always been smart. But it sure as hell seems like they’re getting smarter.


Welcome to Grantland’s 2014 MLB Over/Under Jamboree. Every year, I scrutinize the projected win totals for all 30 major league teams, then highlight the handful of clubs I think are most likely to finish over or under those figures. It’s one of my favorite annualtraditions, but it’s also one that’s grown tougher each year. The oddsmakers aren’t simply getting better at putting out on-point numbers year to year; they’re getting better week to week, and with the lines constantly changing, it becomes increasingly difficult to know when to act. Look at the odds that Reno’s Atlantis Casino posted just three weeks ago, and then compare them to what’s out there today. This is no picnic.



Undaunted, we press on. It’s not all bad: The odds help establish a framework under which we can begin evaluating all 30 teams and figuring out how they might fare in the season ahead. Moreover, by sniffing out the teams that might go over or under the betting lines, we can gain insight into certain competitive advantages and disadvantages that broad-stroke predictions might not reveal. And hey, if we can all make a few Gummi Bears in the process, no harm there.


Since every sportsbook and online betting site offers slightly different over/under numbers and odds, and since transparency is one of the goals here, I’m settling on Sportsbook.ag as my baseline. That’s by no means an endorsement, and if you can find better odds elsewhere, you should take them.
Here are the MLB wagers I like most for 2014:
[h=2]Cleveland Indians: OVER 80.5 wins[/h]
That number looks … off, doesn’t it? The Indians surged to 92 wins last year behind one of the most powerful offenses in the league and a young, effective starting rotation. Very little has changed for the worse. While losing Ubaldo Jimenez’s impressive 2013 numbers will hurt, getting a full season from Official 2013 Grantland Crush Danny Salazar and a breakout campaign from fellow right-handed starter Corey Kluber could mitigate that loss. With none of Cleveland’s five projected starters older than 28, there’s upside across the board here.


If you’re looking for an X factor, though, consider something for which the typical projection systems and even Vegas likely won’t properly account: This season, Carlos Santana will no longer be Cleveland’s primary catcher. Whether you’re examining multiyearor single-year numbers, Santana consistently grades out as one of the worst pitch framers in the game. And while analysts are just beginning to quantify the effects of pitch blocking and other defensive skills for catchers, the industry consensus has long been that Santana is a designated hitter who happens to wear a mask. Assuming the Tribe do the right thing by making Santana the everyday DH while handing primary backstop duties to Yan Gomes, who was one of the best receivers in the league last year according to the above metrics, it wouldn’t be a stretch to project something like a two- or three-win improvement based on that move alone. And that might even be understating it. If Gomes’s defensive skills are allowed to flourish over 120-plus starts, it could help push Cleveland’s young staff to elite status this season.


Combine all that with a balanced lineup that will get even better when top shortstop prospect Francisco Lindor reaches the big leagues — and frees up the Indians to consider trading Asdrubal Cabrera to address whatever weaknesses might arise — and it’s really tough to imagine the Indians finishing below .500 … which is what would have to happen to lose this bet. This is my highest-confidence wager for 2014.
 
From Grantland:

<header class="title-card" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px -1.25em -6em -1px; padding: 1em 182px 2em 0px; position: relative; top: -6em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Knockout 31 A', 'Knockout 31 B', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20.799999237060547px;">MLB
[h=1]MLB Over/Under Jamboree[/h]Good news for the Mets? Bad news for the Yankees? The chance to win some Gummi Bears? It must be time for the annual MLB Over/Under report.
BY JONAH KERI ON MARCH 7, 2014

</header>When cranking out baseball betting odds, Vegas and online sportsbooks have always used a combination of rigorous data analysis and information on individuals’ betting habits to ensure that picking winners is a challenge. We laypeople like to think we’re brilliant when we cross-reference the latest PECOTA, ZiPS, and Steamer projections against the prevailing odds. In reality, however, the books are fully aware of every projection system that exists, and probably have their own forecasters pumping out numbers most of us never get to see.


The sharps have always been smart. But it sure as hell seems like they’re getting smarter.


Welcome to Grantland’s 2014 MLB Over/Under Jamboree. Every year, I scrutinize the projected win totals for all 30 major league teams, then highlight the handful of clubs I think are most likely to finish over or under those figures. It’s one of my favorite annualtraditions, but it’s also one that’s grown tougher each year. The oddsmakers aren’t simply getting better at putting out on-point numbers year to year; they’re getting better week to week, and with the lines constantly changing, it becomes increasingly difficult to know when to act. Look at the odds that Reno’s Atlantis Casino posted just three weeks ago, and then compare them to what’s out there today. This is no picnic.



Undaunted, we press on. It’s not all bad: The odds help establish a framework under which we can begin evaluating all 30 teams and figuring out how they might fare in the season ahead. Moreover, by sniffing out the teams that might go over or under the betting lines, we can gain insight into certain competitive advantages and disadvantages that broad-stroke predictions might not reveal. And hey, if we can all make a few Gummi Bears in the process, no harm there.


Since every sportsbook and online betting site offers slightly different over/under numbers and odds, and since transparency is one of the goals here, I’m settling on Sportsbook.ag as my baseline. That’s by no means an endorsement, and if you can find better odds elsewhere, you should take them.
Here are the MLB wagers I like most for 2014:
[h=2]Cleveland Indians: OVER 80.5 wins[/h]
That number looks … off, doesn’t it? The Indians surged to 92 wins last year behind one of the most powerful offenses in the league and a young, effective starting rotation. Very little has changed for the worse. While losing Ubaldo Jimenez’s impressive 2013 numbers will hurt, getting a full season from Official 2013 Grantland Crush Danny Salazar and a breakout campaign from fellow right-handed starter Corey Kluber could mitigate that loss. With none of Cleveland’s five projected starters older than 28, there’s upside across the board here.


If you’re looking for an X factor, though, consider something for which the typical projection systems and even Vegas likely won’t properly account: This season, Carlos Santana will no longer be Cleveland’s primary catcher. Whether you’re examining multiyearor single-year numbers, Santana consistently grades out as one of the worst pitch framers in the game. And while analysts are just beginning to quantify the effects of pitch blocking and other defensive skills for catchers, the industry consensus has long been that Santana is a designated hitter who happens to wear a mask. Assuming the Tribe do the right thing by making Santana the everyday DH while handing primary backstop duties to Yan Gomes, who was one of the best receivers in the league last year according to the above metrics, it wouldn’t be a stretch to project something like a two- or three-win improvement based on that move alone. And that might even be understating it. If Gomes’s defensive skills are allowed to flourish over 120-plus starts, it could help push Cleveland’s young staff to elite status this season.


Combine all that with a balanced lineup that will get even better when top shortstop prospect Francisco Lindor reaches the big leagues — and frees up the Indians to consider trading Asdrubal Cabrera to address whatever weaknesses might arise — and it’s really tough to imagine the Indians finishing below .500 … which is what would have to happen to lose this bet. This is my highest-confidence wager for 2014.

Buster Olney and Grantland have a love affair with the Indians.
 
Even I'm starting to get optimistic with the Indians. Mainly because they aren't attempting to put in wash out veterans into the lineup and rotation (5th spot looks to be mainly between Carrasco & Bauer) . Let the young guys play.

Now if only we can get Lindor in that lineup quickly..
 
Even I'm starting to get optimistic with the Indians. Mainly because they aren't attempting to put in wash out veterans into the lineup and rotation (5th spot looks to be mainly between Carrasco & Bauer) . Let the young guys play.

Now if only we can get Lindor in that lineup quickly..

Old man Giambi scoffs at your remarks.
 
Old man Giambi scoffs at your remarks.
I consider him more as a bench coach who I guess, can run into one off the bench on occasion. The roster spot could definitely be used a wee bit more effectively. Not worth getting upset about though.
 
2014 MLB Predictions:

AL EAST: Tampa Bay Rays
AL CENTRAL: Cleveland Indians
AL WEST: Texas Rangers
AL WILD CARDS: Detroit Tigers and Boston Red Sox

NL EAST: Washington Nationals
NL CENTRAL: St. Louis Cardinals
NL WEST: Los Angeles Dodgers
NL WILD CARDS: Atlanta Braves and Cincinnati Reds

Wild Card Games: Detroit over Boston
Cincinnati over Atlanta

ALDS: Detroit over Texas, Tampa Bay over Cleveland
NLDS: LA Dodgers over Cincinnati, Washington over St Louis
ALCS: Detroit over Tampa Bay
NLCS: LA Dodgers over Washington

WORLD SERIES: Los Angeles Dodgers over Detroit Tigers
 
AL West - Oakland
AL Central - Detroit
AL East - Boston
AL Wild Cards - Texas over Baltimore


NL West - Los Angeles
NL Central - St. Louis
NL East - Washington
NL Wild Cards - Arizona over Atlanta


ALDS - Oakland over Detroit, Texas over Boston
ALCS - Texas over Oakland
NLDS - Los Angeles over Arizona, Washington over St. Louis
NLCS - Washington over Los Angeles


World Series - Washington over Texas

Really believe the NL comes down to the Dodgers and Nationals... The Dodgers are always a threat to pull off a move and they have a really complete team for the most part... However, I truly believe Harper becomes a force this season (have you seen him ? ) and I love the Fister trade for the Nationals... IMO, if they are healthy they have the best rotation in baseball.. Love the bullpen too with Soriano anchoring down a save in the 9th... My only concern is a new manager (Matt Williams) and how he will perform ? But, do believe Matt Williams is the type of new manager that could thrive based on the type of team he has and the type of philosophy he goes by... Plus, he was a bench coach a few seasons in Arizona... So we will see.... But that rotation is well built--- so I'm going Nationals in the NL...

AL is tough.. Not going Yankees is tough here in the East.. Love the moves, but the rotation is simply not up to par... CC has aged and it's showing.. Tanaka is unknown.. 2nd and 3rd are fill in types.. The SS is 40 as well.. So it pains me to say, but I would be pleasantly surprised if they got the division or a wildcard spot..... BECAUSE ,quite honestly, Baltimore and Boston are better.. Tho Boston is a year older, lost Jacoby, and Drew, I think they are a damn good team... The rotation and bullpen is nasty... The shortstop (Bogaerts) has a chance to be very special... One of the low key signings this season that I loved was AJ Pierzinski.. Especially for that club and that short right field foul pole...Another grinder , leader, veteran that really fits that Red Sox mold... One could easily choose Boston to win it all again, but I think the key for them is to have 1 if not 2 young guys step up and produce this season--which is a lot to ask.. I just don't know if a team full of grinding vets can do it again ?

Also love what Baltimore is doing and has done... Would not be surprised if they went far this year..

Detroit still has the best 1-2 punch in the front of the rotation and Porcello could make it lethal... Miggy is still the best player in the divison... Nathan was such a quality signing to close games as well.... However, like Washington, first time manager ??? Might not bode well with a veteran club--- tho it didn't hurt St Louis a few years ago..

Oakland is such a wildcard.. Easily my favorite team to watch.. It was tough deciding Texas over Oakland in the ALCS-- cause I would not be shocked if Oakland won it all... I just think Texas has the best pitcher in the series, a nice combination of power and players who get on base... So they get the nod...

Ultimately I think Washington with its combination of youth, continued improvement, potential dominant starting pitching-- edges out an American League team to win it all...
 
Losing Benoit and signing Nathan is essentially a wash for Detroit based on last year's performances. In terms of who has a better chance of repeating last year's success, it's definitely Nathan, but even then, I don't think he'll be much better than Benoit was last year.

I do think Detroit will be roughly the same record wise as last year. They lost talent, but they underachieved and had a worse record than they should have. Loss of Fister hurts, but assuming Detroit has more luck (finished with 6 wins lower than Pythagorean W-L of 99-63), they should be a 90-95 win team again.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top