TheLand1287
Gold Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 3,288
- Reaction score
- 4,852
- Points
- 113
The thing is that the Browns knew he sucked long before today, so why didn't they release him earlier, so he could have participated in FA or whatever? And, it doesn't sound (this is speculation, though) that there was any effort to trade him. That suggests to me it wasn't something besides generic suckage that led to his release.
Someone upthread wondered about Little being a bad influence on Gordon, and I'm kind of curious as to exactly what the Browns learned during Tuesday's meeting with Rosenhaus.
If I remember correctly the front office (well, previous front office) wanted Chud to cut Greg Little in the middle of last season to show players that they were going to be held accountable for their play on the field, and character off the field. Chud refused to do so, which didn't help him in keeping his job... but that's another topic entirely. IMO, the writing has been on the wall for some time with Little. It was just a matter of trying to upgrade during the draft, or if that didn't work out, then immediately after. As we have now seen... the later occured.