Shack
Situational Stopper
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 215
- Points
- 43
Draftexpress average measurement for top 30 rated PFs in their database, is 7'1 wingspan and 8'11 standing reach. A few sources seem to indicate Bennett is around 7'1 wingspan and 8'9 standing reach. If so Bennett is a few inches undersized in standing reach but average in wingspan, which makes sense when considering how his thickness helps his wingspan
7'1 wingspan and 8'9 standing reach is identical to Paul Millsap's measurements. If true some may say that to take "so the best we can get is Millsap", but that's just not true. Blake and Love have 8'9-8'10 standing reaches respectively and wingspans shorter than Millsap or Bennett, at around 6'11. The reason Millsap is not a star like Blake and Love isn't his standing reach. It's because his other talents aren't as good as theirs either. Millsap is also an average athlete at best and while having great skill, he's not as freakish as KLove in that area either, or maybe not even Blake. Yes his lack of reach hurts him but it's one piece among many in the puzzle when determining why he's not one of the best players in the NBA.
Depending on what's included in the definition a case can be made none of Love, Blake, Millsap or Bennett are undersized. They all have less length than the average PF but more strength. So what is the net of their strength/length? For Kevin Love I think it is certainly positive since he has the most strength and the highest standing reach of the group. If seeing him as a plus sized PF it starts to make sense how his upside has been this high with everything else he has going for him. I would call Millsap's either average or slightly undersized, with the 8'9 standing reach and less strength than Love or Blake IMO. Blake and Bennett are probably either average or above average in the net of length and strength.
Overall Bennett's size won't prevent him from being as good as Blake or Love. It's the other stuff. How will his bball IQ be, will he really turn into a great 3pt shooter, can he become a good post up threat, will attacking off the dribble be consistent, will he have the lateral mobility to stay with PFs, etc.?
7'1 wingspan and 8'9 standing reach is identical to Paul Millsap's measurements. If true some may say that to take "so the best we can get is Millsap", but that's just not true. Blake and Love have 8'9-8'10 standing reaches respectively and wingspans shorter than Millsap or Bennett, at around 6'11. The reason Millsap is not a star like Blake and Love isn't his standing reach. It's because his other talents aren't as good as theirs either. Millsap is also an average athlete at best and while having great skill, he's not as freakish as KLove in that area either, or maybe not even Blake. Yes his lack of reach hurts him but it's one piece among many in the puzzle when determining why he's not one of the best players in the NBA.
Depending on what's included in the definition a case can be made none of Love, Blake, Millsap or Bennett are undersized. They all have less length than the average PF but more strength. So what is the net of their strength/length? For Kevin Love I think it is certainly positive since he has the most strength and the highest standing reach of the group. If seeing him as a plus sized PF it starts to make sense how his upside has been this high with everything else he has going for him. I would call Millsap's either average or slightly undersized, with the 8'9 standing reach and less strength than Love or Blake IMO. Blake and Bennett are probably either average or above average in the net of length and strength.
Overall Bennett's size won't prevent him from being as good as Blake or Love. It's the other stuff. How will his bball IQ be, will he really turn into a great 3pt shooter, can he become a good post up threat, will attacking off the dribble be consistent, will he have the lateral mobility to stay with PFs, etc.?