Tom Reed at the PD takes on this question:
Keeping Baron Davis a Cleveland Cavalier: The pros and cons
Published: Saturday, December 03, 2011, 7:34 PM Updated: Saturday, December 03, 2011, 7:34 PM
By Tom Reed, The Plain Dealer
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Baron Davis spent part of the NBA lockout producing a documentary on the declining sartorial standards of the American men.
But what the fashion-forward point guard wears during the regular season's opening night is for now largely in the hands of Cavaliers General Manager Chris Grant. It's an important decision, and not an easy one.
Does the GM release the 32-year-old Davis through the amnesty clause, a provision in the new collective bargaining agreement, which would free up millions in salary cap space and turn over the point-guard duties to rookie Kyrie Irving? Or, does Grant retain Davis, who made the Cavaliers appreciatively better upon his arrival late last season, and let him mentor the league's No. 1 overall pick?
A compelling argument can be made both ways.
While nothing is finalized, the clause currently enables teams to cut one player with pay during the lifetime of the agreement, provided he was on the roster as of July 1, 2011. The player gets his money and becomes a free agent. The franchise gets relief for salary-cap and luxury-tax purposes.
However, a team must make its amnesty decision before a season starts. It's believed the Cavs will be methodical in approach, going into training camp, which opens Friday, before making the call.
Forward Antawn Jamison, in the final year of a deal that pays him about $12 million (post-lockout price), is another amnesty candidate. But Davis has an extra year on his contract and the Cavs have more depth at his position.
Keeping with league mandates, Grant cannot comment on CBA provisions until they are official. That won't stop others from debating the issue:
The case for cutting Davis
The 19-year-old Irving is a franchise building block and needs all the experience coach Byron Scott can afford him. It's going to be his offense to run eventually, so why not let him run it in a season when wins and losses are not as important as development?
Irving needs to learn clock management. He requires the ball in his hands as the seconds tick away and decisions must be made. He's playing for a coach who started point guard Chris Paul 78 games in his rookie season.
If Davis is on the floor at the same time as Irving he's going to command the ball and demand the offense runs through him. He has befriended Irving and offered to help him through his rookie season. But Davis is a 12-year veteran and a two-time All Star. He's not going to be satisfied either splitting time or playing shooting guard.
Davis might also do harm to the Cavs' chances of earning another top-5 lottery pick. They went 13-54 prior to Davis' arrival and 6-9 after it. The franchise needs another injection of high-end talent from the draft and a ninth- or 10th-place finish in the Eastern Conference is going to supply it.
Releasing Davis -- owed roughly $26 million over the next two seasons -- provides tremendous financial flexibility. It also would bring the Cavs under the $58 million salary cap and make them eligible for the modified waiver process that gives such teams first crack at submitting bids for amnestied players.
The Cavs are wary of letting him become a free agent only to sign with LeBron James and the Miami Heat. But New York, Charlotte and the Los Angeles Lakers are rumored to be his most desired destinations, according to ESPN.com.
Thanks for an entertaining final month of the season, Baron, and good luck with the documentary.
The case for keeping Davis
Scott has a history of making dramatic improvements in his second season with teams. The 2001-02 New Jersey Nets enjoyed a 26-win spike en route to the NBA Finals. The 2005-06 New Orleans Hornets collected 20 more victories than the previous season.
In New Orleans, the franchise made its jump after Davis was dealt to Golden State. Coach and player have clashed, but the relationship has been repaired. It's believed Scott would be in favor of retaining the veteran.
Davis makes players around him better. He told The Plain Dealer in September he welcomes the chance to shepherd Irving through his rookie season. He knows the moods of the demanding Scott and could help his teenager teammate interpret them. There will be little practice time for Irving during a 66-game schedule crammed into four months.
Although the playoffs aren't a realistic goal, the Cavaliers have to avoid developing a losing culture, especially coming off a 19-win season. They don't want to morph into the NBA's version of the New York Islanders, a hockey franchise unable to abate losing despite a steady parade of high draft picks.
Davis's return would enable Grant to trade another guard, perhaps Ramon Sessions, for a player or future assets. If Davis plays well and Irving shows development they might also try dealing the veteran at the deadline, although next season's salary of $14.7 million is not exactly priced to move.
If the Cavaliers decide to use the provision they should cut Jamison. Meanwhile, Davis stays and invites Irving as his VIP guest to the premiere of "American Schlub" right here in Cleveland.
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2011/12/keeping_baron_davis_a_clevelan.html