spydy13
NBA Starter
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,280
- Reaction score
- 3,600
- Points
- 113
I don't really get either side of the argument to be honest. There's two camps, it seems; those who are unhappy that the Browns aren't signing the high-end, high-priced free agents and those who want to exclusively build the team through the draft. Neither of which, in my opinion, are smart ideas for where the team is right now. We've seen hundreds of instances where big free agency spending spells disaster for an organization. On the other hand, just because a team spends some cash in free agency, does that preclude them from building thru the draft or preclude them from making solid draft choices? That's kinda silly too.
I really liked what they did last year, bringing in Whitner and Dansby right at the start of free agency and Hawkins, Dray and Tate a little bit later on. None of those guys broke the bank and they all (except Tate) contributed greatly to the team last year, both on and off the field. Those players really supplemented the roster, not asked or paid to carry it, which is exactly what this team needs. With their documented interest in certain players and taking visits, it kinda seems like they tried to do something similar this year but struck out, for one reason or another.
I totally agree with your main point, but I think there is still a chance to sign some second/third tier guys.