- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 12,391
- Reaction score
- 18,850
- Points
- 123
With all due respect, I wouldn't count on it W&G...
I think it would require trading up to #2 and if that costs us the #24, that's a little too steep a price to pay. I can't help but feel that you're speaking with your heart and not necessarily your head.
I sure hope we can swing a deal like #4 +#33 for #2, but it's just not realistic.
I'm not a big MKG fan at this point but if he's the player that really makes a difference than I absolutely trade 24 with 4 to get him at 2. It's a small price to pay to get the guy you really want. The 24th pick in the draft is a marginal player typically, some outliers but a guy who is good enough to hang on in the league a few years. I throw that type of guy into almost any deal to land a cornerstone player. Again, I'm not sure MKG is that cornerstone guy.