Alright skip Bayless, if you really think kyrie is a rich mans boobie Gibson then I don't have much to say to you, boobie Gibson didn't last more than one season holding Kyries jock
Are you asking me a question or are you just creating a strawman?
Alright skip Bayless, if you really think kyrie is a rich mans boobie Gibson then I don't have much to say to you, boobie Gibson didn't last more than one season holding Kyries jock
Are you asking me a question or are you just creating a strawman?
Harden is a combo guard and often ran the point in OKC.
It's called a statement, and it addresses your blatant ignorance. There is no straw man because I'm not wrong.
You've started with a falsehood and then drawn conclusions from it. That's pretty much the definition of a straw man argument.
I dunno, seems like many people are doing away with describing players in the traditional 5 positions. Seems more and more common to describe someone as a guard, wing or big (or even just a wing or big).
You've started with a falsehood and then drawn conclusions from it. That's pretty much the definition of a straw man argument.
So you're implying that you didn't call Kyrie a rich mans boobie gibson. How has that narrative been created then? what did you say that made people think you actually said that? not looking to be combative, just curious.
If you're curious then join in the fun and answer my question ... Is a rich man's Boobie Gibson a top-5 PG in the league?
But I didn't start with a falsehood, you hold a belief that is ignorant and incorrect, I'm simply correcting your falsehood.
what does that have to do with what I asked you? I'm not interested in that discussion I'm interested in how the notion that you called Kyrie a rich man boobie gibson has arised if you didn't say that. Why do you keep going back to that top 5 pg line?
Why aren't you interested in that discussion? It is *the* discussion.