1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. From courtside seating to loudville Amazing Tickets offers a fantastic selection of Cavs tickets at the cheapest prices found anywhere.
  3. Please select the "Splash-Mobile" style if ads are breaking your tablet/phone's browser.

Pluto: Childress, WCO, and the draft

Discussion in 'Browns Talk' started by Triplethreat, Feb 6, 2012.

  1. Triplethreat

    Triplethreat Sixth Man

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,760
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    Location:
    OH-IO

    Wouldn't complain if we went defense with the 4 pick. Ore decided to move down and get more picks, then took Coples to go opposite of Sheard. Because AFC North teams are built on the premise that defense wins titles.

    Thoughts?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. bigjmac0815

    bigjmac0815 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,960
    Likes Received:
    601
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    wouldn't mind solidifying our defense at #4 if RGIII isn't there....he'd be too hard to pass up after what Cam Newton did this past season
     
  3. Soda

    Soda Bania'd

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,567
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Location:
    East Side of CLE
    I agree with you. I don't want to give up picks to move around the top of the draft. If RG3 falls to 4, I'm taking him or selling to the highest bidder. If he isn't there, I'm either trading down slightly or grabbing the top player on the Browns board. If he is defense, fine. It isn't like the Browns are set on defense and they could use a great CB/DE for certain.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Randolphkeys

    Randolphkeys Admittedly Pompous Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    34,935
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Hey, defense and a slightly above average offense just won the Super Bowl.

    While drafting Claiborne wouldn't surprise me, my biggest surprise would be ANYONE knowing exactly what the Browns plan to do. Their first round plan in the last two drafts have been completely impossible to predict.
     
    • Like Like x 9
  5. Triplethreat

    Triplethreat Sixth Man

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,760
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    Location:
    OH-IO
    I'm one that thinks the Browns are pretty committed to solidifying the defense first.

    I for one would love Coples in the 8-10 range if it means we grab another first next year.

    Our D-Line would be set for the next 10 years with Coples, and it would be looking like an ELITE D-Line, sort of the route the Giants went. Also, we need good pass rush from our front four because of our defense under Jauron, is more base and doesn't mix in too many blitzes.
     
  6. Chris

    Chris Welcome to the Future

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,678
    Likes Received:
    13,411
    Location:
    Ohio
    I feel like the defense is already solidified in that it is above average....do we really need the 4th pick in the draft to go defense now, too?

    If we do, it better be a legitimate game changing defensive player.
     
  7. bigjmac0815

    bigjmac0815 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,960
    Likes Received:
    601
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    I would rather take Claiborne over Coples at #4 if we go defense
     
  8. Rookie

    Rookie Situational Stopper

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    266
    Location:
    Cleveland, Ohio
    We have a top 7 defense, I really think it's time we work on our offense.
     
  9. cdt

    cdt Oh My God! Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    22,224
    Likes Received:
    9,605
    Location:
    OH-IO
    I don't want Couples I've heard his attitude sucks, I'll go with Claiborne.

    This defense better do some sadistic fucking training in Arizona or Denver because they're going to be on the field about 50 minutes a game.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. speedyd718

    speedyd718 Game Changer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    303
    Location:
    Cleveland
    This is a joke right, because Eli isn't slightly above average in the least bit. Let's get real here. We need a QB and going defense isn't an option, on my board anyway.
    /rant
     
    • Like Like x 7
  11. Soda

    Soda Bania'd

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,567
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Location:
    East Side of CLE
    Not necessarily. I, for one, am not in favor of trading up and losing picks just because we have needs on offense. If the best player on the board is a defensive guy, I'm in favor of taking it unless we're able to get a good deal in a trade.

    Agreed. The player should be a slam-dunk stud.
     
  12. DaNewCavs

    DaNewCavs In the Rotation

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    569
    Location:
    Sagamore Hills
    Eli is better than slightly above average, but their running game was worst in the league this year. They were also middle of the league in giveaways. The Giants offense only appears much better because we have gotten used to watching the Browns putrid offense for the past 3 years.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  13. Chris

    Chris Welcome to the Future

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,678
    Likes Received:
    13,411
    Location:
    Ohio
    I do agree with you in that I am absolutely against trading ANY picks, whatsoever, unless it involves getting Luck. :chuckles: I just find it hard to believe RG3 won't be there at #4 and I have trouble passing him up for more defense. I mean, the season has only been over for a couple months. Have we already forgotten the nightmares induced by watching this offense?
     
  14. Soda

    Soda Bania'd

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,567
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Location:
    East Side of CLE
    We're on the same page. I want RG3 at #4. If he's not there and the next best guy is on defense. Defense it is. I'd also trade up for Luck.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. speedyd718

    speedyd718 Game Changer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    303
    Location:
    Cleveland
    I felt like this until last night. The throw that Eli makes on the sideline to Manningham did it for me. We need a QB that can make that throw, at all costs. Those throws win games.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. caf

    caf Banņed

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,607
    Likes Received:
    5,589
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Granted that was a great throw, but what good is a great throw if we don't have a receiver on our offense that could pull that in?

    God, this offense has more holes than swiss cheese. Hopefully we get VJax or Colston. Doubtful though.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. Gimme Some Mo

    Gimme Some Mo All-Star

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    7,466
    For some reason, some people still view the Giants as the Giants of 4 years ago. They aren't that dominate defensive team anymore.

    Giants offense was 9th overall at 24.6 PPG.

    Giants defense was 25th overall at 25 ppg allowed.




    The Browns on the other hand were 5th overall at 19.2 ppg allowed (20 spots better than the Giants) and yet they went 4-12. IMO it should pretty much be common sense that the Browns need to go offense.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  18. DaNewCavs

    DaNewCavs In the Rotation

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    569
    Location:
    Sagamore Hills
    They dealt with a lot of injuries on defense during the regular season, which is why they only finished 9-7 this year. However, they got healthy toward the end. They finished strong giving up only 84 points in their last 6 games. 4 of those games were against top ten offenses in the league.
     
    • Like Like x 11
  19. GreatGoo

    GreatGoo Awaiting 1st Championship

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    152
    Location:
    Fairview Park
    Speedy you and I are on the same page. This a QB league now with all the rule changes. We will never see another Dilfer. We need to draft a franchise QB. End of story. But if the Browns don't feel that RG3 is a franchise QB then I'm all for taking the best player available, offense or defense.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Gimme Some Mo

    Gimme Some Mo All-Star

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    7,466
    If the Browns do go defense, the defense could be amazing if they hit on the picks. The Browns could try to create their defense this season, and then only have to worry about the offense in the future. I highly doubt this will happen, but what if they took defense with their first 3 picks (or 2 out of the 3). The defense could look something like this....

    CB: Haden, Claiborne, Brown, Skrine

    S: Ward, Young/Adams/Brown

    LB: DQ, Cocong, #22/36, Maiva

    DL: Sheard, Taylor, Rubin, #36/22

    That is a very young defense that would be together for the next 5 years (or more). Obviously our offense would still be terrible, but at least we'd have one side of the ball figured out.
     

Share This Page