Re: So Clippers owner Donald Sterling is extremely racist
I think there's more behind it than race or racism.
I think it was intentionally orchestrated to get him out of power and replace him.
You can call it a conspiracy "theory," but I'm sure at some point, it will come out in the wash that she was put up to this on a higher level by someone(s) who will ultimately either become part of the ownership group or at least bid aggressively on the team.
I think this gave the NBA an opportunity they've been waiting for to oust a dinosaur and replace him with a group that they see as being a bigger benefit to the NBA as a whole.
Usually when the punishment seems a little irrational, the intentions of the punisher are self-serving.
I agree with this somewhat, though not necessarily to this level. Obviously, there are things behind the scenes the public doesn't know about. Things we'll probably never know about. Some of the stories have leaked. The claim that Sterling didn't want to negotiate with black players. The accusation that he wanted a team comprised of "poor black boys from the south and a white head coach" (
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/27/us/donald-sterling-lawsuits/). I'm sure there are others that I'm missing, but because there was never any hard evidence, just rumors and quotes that could never be confirmed (because Sterling would deny them, and has denied them), the NBA really didn't have the opportunity to remove him.
Let's take Sterling's views on race out of this: The guy was a SHITTY owner. The Clippers, until recently, were a laughingstock of a franchise. Sterling refused to spend money on them. He housed them, for the longest time, in a decrepit arena because it was cheap. The guy was literally using them to further his own interests. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on your views, an owner can't just be removed because he's not trying to better the team. As long as he was following the rules and making payroll, there is really no recourse for the commissioner or owners to remove him. And they couldn't use all the legal issues he had gotten in because he'd never technically been found guilty of anything. He'd either won the suit or settled, and settling is NOT an admission of guilt. However, it was well-known that he was doing these things, and there were far too many people on that side to just ignore.
Which brings us back to the comments leaked by Stiviano's "friend." Yes, it was the opportunity they'd been waiting for to oust him. But was it intentionally orchestrated? I'm not buying that. I think it was merely good fortune. I think there may have been more than enough behind the scenes to justify this, but we may never know what. It just seems like now more than ever people feel the need to find a reason behind everything. Every single event has to be tied to together. Someone had to have been pulling the strings. When in reality, what likely happened is the "friend" (or Stiviano) knew what they had was gold and got paid off for it by TMZ. That leaked, the players flipped, the sponsors started dropping out, and Silver did the only thing he could to salvage the postseason. There were probably enough stories behind the scenes that the league knew about, and they knew those could get out at any minute. They'd be more worried about it now that Sterling is on tape. Now, if those stories leak, they can pass them off as rumors that they didn't believe at the time.
I don't know, I kind of lost my train of thought halfway through. Hope this made a little bit of sense.
(Now, if Magic gets the team, and LeBron goes there... all bets are off. :chuckles