I asked a similar question (to the forum), but didn't get a response. I think it's been pretty fucking clear that Hoyer is a pretty significant catalyst in the Browns' wins thus far. All I get back is something about "Hoyer is gonna Hoyer".. That's a bad thing?
I (and I think most Hoyer/Browns supporters) understand that Hoyer isn't Aaron Rodgers. He certainly is more than a stop-gap, though. He's got the offense playing for him, he's made clutch throws and he's put the team in a position to win with his play. That is the outline of "Hoyer being Hoyer" to this point. We're at the point where he's being criticized for missing 2 or 3 throws a game. Is the assumption that good QBs don't ever miss a throw? That's doubtful.
This is interesting as it paints Hoyer as pretty good, albeit not a top tier QB: