- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reaction score
- 12,911
- Points
- 123
Windhorst has lost his sources and is quickly losing credibility. If I don't hear it from RCF I tend not to believe it these days.
The boot thing is still surprising. Do they usually have a player wear a boot for a sprain? High ankle sprain?
It's not a coincidence that Lloyd stopped breaking stories and started scorching the Cavs once he got fired.
It certainly seemed like there were some raw nerves down the whole vertical stack of ownership, front office, coaching, players, & journalists last winter, didn't it? Fortunately, the Cavs have the opportunity to do a lot of winning this year, and as they say, winning fixes everything. Well, maybe with the sole exception of bloated egos.
Windbag said tonight the Bulls would have "easily beaten" us if they played rose 40 mins even if we played Lebron the whole game.
In that article, Windhorst calls Andy, "Not a good offensive player."
Da fuq?
I've read this in my head about 20 times and it still doesn't sound much better... Maybe it's just me?The actual quote was "could've".
http://espn.go.com/nba/preview2014/story/_/id/11737310/lebron-cavs-impressed-bulls-rose
If Rose played 40 minutes Monday, the Bulls easily could've beaten the Cavs even had they given James a full run
In that article, Windhorst calls Andy, "Not a good offensive player."
Da fuq?