I dont know how many of you can call this a great draft, it isn't at all..
I like Pool and I like Frye, but the first day passes and we did not improve our team this year.
But in the end, Edwards will be a very good WR and Pool, I dont think I would have passed on Barnes either..Frye is solid for our future QB.
Somebody asked who I would have taken...I would have took whatever any team offered me in a trade down. I would have selected Merriman in that trade down or DJ.
So I would have Davis and Merriman.DJ on the field instead of Edwards and I would take that 100 days out of 100 days.
Im not eluding that Edwards is a good WR or will be one, I think he will be very good....but the bottom line is WRs will not win you a game.
A RB can, so a QB isnt the only one. And a LT plays every single offense play. A WR is in maybe 5 plays a game, close to 10 if he a great WR. So really here, a WR isnt making that much of a difference when our #1 WR is WInslow anyway....Bryant is more than capable of catching 75 balls, and Davis can get 50+ in his sleep if he stays healthy.
So excuse me for not being excited about Edwards....nevermind his questionable hands...Im just talking facts of a WR.
Ill give this draft a C so far, because neither Frye nor Pool will provide anything for the next two years. (maybe Frye). Edwards is not in an offense that will allow him to be great, but he will be solid...hopefully, David Terrell was a great UM WR and was a bust.
Just be happy we arent Denver, who selected three straight corner backs and then Mo Clarrett..