Oh my! Clutch your pearls!
I don’t know that it means the Browns do not retain Higgins.17th overall and a 2nd next year? Now its pretty reasonable.
If we do this deal, anyone have an issue that means Higgins probably walks?
The one I would've let walk is Perriman--especially if you're hypothetically getting OBJ. I still like the WR depth in the middle rounds.I don’t know that it means the Browns do not retain Higgins.
OBJ, Jarvis, Higgins, Callaway, and Perriman is a nice group of five receivers.
But yeah, if you make this trade, re-signing Higgins is slightly less important. I just would like to keep him because of the relationship with Baker.
The one I would've let walk is Perriman--especially if you're hypothetically getting OBJ. I still like the WR depth in the middle rounds.
Agreed! I think Perriman is probably fools’ gold, though. My guess is he ends up as the fifth wideout.The one I would've let walk is Perriman--especially if you're hypothetically getting OBJ. I still like the WR depth in the middle rounds.
Just brought back Perriman on a 1 year deal.The one I would've let walk is Perriman--especially if you're hypothetically getting OBJ. I still like the WR depth in the middle rounds.
Sure. I'm just saying, that's a full receiving room. Bringing Perriman back, even this cheap, might be a sign that Higgins could be on his way out.Well, at one year, four million he's basically free, so whatever.
Just brought back Perriman on a 1 year deal.
I don’t know that it means the Browns do not retain Higgins.
OBJ, Jarvis, Higgins, Callaway, and Perriman is a nice group of five receivers.
But yeah, if you make this trade, re-signing Higgins is slightly less important. I just would like to keep him because of the relationship with Baker.
I think this has more legs than some are giving it. Zirm, Anderson, Canton Rep, and Zegura are all reporting variants of this trade.
Just brought back Perriman on a 1 year deal.
The issue is there is a good chance that both Higgins and Perriman are over paid...