Huber.
Adrninistrator
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 21,391
- Reaction score
- 17,184
- Points
- 123
It looks cheap. Which is a good start for tax payers. At the very least it will get away from the downtown crime
It looks cheap. Which is a good start for tax payers. At the very least it will get away from the downtown crime
The city of Cleveland is not meeting the Browns demands. Like, not even close. This is more than a pie in the sky; it's the Haslams most logical option (sans their preferred stadium location of Columbus). There is no calling any bluffs, the city has made it clear what they think they can afford, and frankly, even the reno plan isn't one they can afford.I think the NFL is trying to get away from 100% turf, moving all surfaces towards at least a blend of grass and turf.
This means that if you want to build a roof, either the roof moves or the turf moves.
It also could be a lot of other reasons. Since this is just a mock-up that the city of Cleveland has to respond to, why not ask for everything on your wish list?
It just looks like a newer version of the colts stadium. I’d rather have a retractable roof though.
It just looks like a newer version of the colts stadium. I’d rather have a retractable roof though.
From this one mock-up picture perspective it goes against most modern domes of having one endzone "open view" with either windows or retractable doors. They could angle the field from SW to NE to have one end zone view be of downtown in the distance like Progressive or PNC park in baseball. Especially if the stadium is partially built below ground level.It just looks like a newer version of the colts stadium. I’d rather have a retractable roof though.
Possibly to give it extra clearance as to not interfere with the air traffic. I think anything 200 feet and above requires reasearch and approval from the FAA and most stadiums are +200 feetLooks like the proposal is retractable roof if I’m seeing it correctly.
Anyone know the purpose/benefit of digging the stadium into the ground like they’re proposing?
Not disagreeing, but just want to add about the retractable roof that doesn’t get talked about.
Arizona has two. The Diamondbacks, after 25 years, no longer is safe to open and close while people are inside the building.
The Cardinals open their roof, and it doesn’t really do anything besides keep the sun off the crowd on half of the stadium.
I also want a roof, but there are experience drawbacks.
I'm definitely looking forward to the value of my house (right next to all this shit) increasing.Has a Cleveland sports team ever played in a Cleveland suburb? Richfield is really s suburb of Akron as it is Summit, I think this will be transformative for Cuyahoga County in a good way. A dome stadium can act as both a sports arena and a major convention center and be built around I know it changes peoples drive and game day feel, but within 3 years of being built and the area being mostly developed it will bring allot of needed revenue to the county and the area.
From this one mock-up picture perspective it goes against most modern domes of having one endzone "open view" with either windows or retractable doors. They could angle the field from SW to NE to have one end zone view be of downtown in the distance like Progressive or PNC park in baseball. Especially if the stadium is partially built below ground level.