djlofi
Dumping salary
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 441
- Reaction score
- 926
- Points
- 93
Amar drops some knowledge on Cavalier Attitude about Carlos Boozer's recent declaration to opt out of his contract after this season. Amar of course gives us some background on Boozer's journey to Utah (taking advantage of a blind man! ). But he also lays out the current situation facing Utah. Namely, they will have to resign Boozer AND Paul Millsap (he's been beastin for my fantasy team!), as well as keep an eye on Korver and Okur.
From the article: (Link)
I've been thinking and I think it makes the most sense for the Cavs to get involved with Utah to help them keep Boozer or help them move him. Possibly moving Boozer to Phoenix and AV to Utah may help facilitate the imaginary Amare to Cleveland trade (Heath :chuckles. If not, I'm all for upgrading Wally into Kirilenko. AK-47 is a jack of trades big man that spreads the floor and plays the defense Mike Brown expects. AK-47 is a walking quadruple-double. If his attitude is right (and he's healthy) a guy like that puts the Cavs more over the top than staying pat because he would mostly absorb Wally's minutes and not cut into AV and Wallace's minutes as much.
From the article: (Link)
The situation for the Jazz, located in the league's smallest market of Salt Lake City, could be destructive and potentially volatile. Both Boozer and Mehmet Okur have opt-outs for next year. Millsap himself, the lowest-paid player on the Jazz roster, is a restricted free agent. Even if Boozer and Okur pick up their player options for 2009-10, Utah's payroll will be $71 million.
The problem there is that the league's luxury tax threshold for this season was $67.8 million. Jazz owner Larry Miller "has vowed publicly he will never exceed" the luxury tax, something that makes sense based on the fact that his Jazz are in the league's smallest market. But Deron Williams' max extension kicks in next season while Andrei Kirilenko is due close to $50 million through the 2010-11 season.
What does this mean for the Cavs?
A discussion about who would want Boozer back and who wouldn't would warrant its own article. But due to the Cavs' escalating payroll, they probably won't be able to be players in free agency this summer to make a play for Millsap (or Boozer, for that matter).
Utah probably isn't going to let either Boozer or Millsap walk for nothing. They'll either a) trade Boozer before the deadline, b) trade Millsap before the deadline, or c) trade somebody else - probably Kirilenko - to make room to re-sign one or both this summer.
That last part regarding Kirilenko might be where the Cavs can cash in. The Jazz may be getting even more desperate to slash payroll as they get closer to the trading deadline. Just pawning off a guy like AK-47 - who comes off the bench at an eight-figure salary - for nothing more than expiring contracts and spare parts would appear more and more likely.
I've been thinking and I think it makes the most sense for the Cavs to get involved with Utah to help them keep Boozer or help them move him. Possibly moving Boozer to Phoenix and AV to Utah may help facilitate the imaginary Amare to Cleveland trade (Heath :chuckles. If not, I'm all for upgrading Wally into Kirilenko. AK-47 is a jack of trades big man that spreads the floor and plays the defense Mike Brown expects. AK-47 is a walking quadruple-double. If his attitude is right (and he's healthy) a guy like that puts the Cavs more over the top than staying pat because he would mostly absorb Wally's minutes and not cut into AV and Wallace's minutes as much.