• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Cliff Lee Q & A about start with Phillies and the Trade

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

elcheato

All-Star
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
7,670
Reaction score
5,325
Points
113
DW: So what's it like to be Cliff Lee these days?
CL: Just like every other day, preparing for my next outing.

DW: Have you needed to make any specific adjustments from American League to National?
CL: Not really. Other than having to hit, and pitching to the opposing pitcher, it's basically the same deal. You're facing major-league hitters. You've got to make pitches. You miss over the plate, you're going to get hurt.

DW: You don't seem to be missing your personal catcher in Cleveland, Kelly Shoppach.
CL: Honestly, (Phillies catcher) Paul Bako reminds me a lot of Shoppach. He's a pretty savvy catcher. It didn't take long for him to understand the way I like to pitch. Bako and Shoppach are pretty crafty. They both call unbelievable games.

DW: What percentage of your success with the Phillies would you attribute to Bako/studying scouting reports/relying on your ability?
CL: I'm relying on Paul Bako, what he throws down, and a feel for the game. Obviously, scouting reports are important, but it's mostly working with my strengths.

DW: Last year, you rode your fastball to the Cy Young. This year, it's still the dominant pitch, but you appear to be mixing in more curves and changeups.
CL: I still feel like I'm commanding the fastball, but yeah, you've got to use all your pitches. It helps to be unpredictable.

DW: In your first two starts this season, you gave up 11 runs in 10 innings and lost twice. Most of the 25 starts since have been quality. Are you pitching as well as you did in 2008?
CL: Similar. Every year's different. I'm giving the team a chance to win. I'm getting deep into games, throwing strikes, not walking many guys. I keep it simple -- you know that. I just try to put up as many zeros as I can.

DW: Did any of the trades the Indians made as part of the summer sell-off surprise you?
CL: My getting traded surprised me.

DW: Seriously?
CL: Yeah. For sure. I really was expecting to stay. I figured that, I was pitching well and I potentially could have been back if they picked up the option. Victor (Martinez), the same thing. They had Grady (Sizemore). They had some pieces there that you could build around to make a pretty good team.

They viewed it differently. I'm not a GM, I'm not a coach. I don't make any of those decisions. I play the game. I was an Indian until I was told I was a Phillie, and now I'm here and I've got to help this team win.

DW: After the trades, Indians President Paul Dolan said you were not going to re-sign with the Indians after 2010. Did Dolan present it accurately?
CL: They told my agent that when we got to spring training this year, we'll talk about an extension. We get there, the first half of spring goes by...nothing. We get down toward the end, they call me in the office and tell me, 'Never mind. We've changed our minds.'

At that point, I told them: 'For me, now's the time. After this year, I'm going to be one year from free agency, and you're going to have to pick up my option if I'm pitching well. Otherwise, I'm a free agent. It doesn't make sense to do it one year out when I just watched what CC did.'

DW: Sabathia, of course, was traded to Milwaukee in 2008 and signed with the Yankees over the winter.
CL: Free agency is where you want to get as a player. That's where you get strength and have control of a situation. Obviously, the closer you get to that, the less likely an extension would be. That's kind of what I told them.

DW: What was their reply?
CL: They said, 'We respect your stance on that, and if anything changes, let us know.' And they said, 'If the economy turns around, if things change, if we start winning, maybe we'll change our opinion, too.' I said, 'OK, fine.' That was kind of the end of it.

DW: Do you feel sad about the sell-off in Cleveland?
CL: Yeah. You get comfortable with a city, teammates, coaches, staff, guys in the training room. Those things make it tough to leave. They run a really good program. They basically helped mold my program and what I do. I was wondering how I was going to be able to translate all those things over here, but it's worked out pretty smoothly for the most part.

DW: Do you feel bad for the fans who see the core of their team traded, fans who wonder, 'Why can't Cliff Lee and Victor Martinez still be around in 2010, to try to make another run at it?'
CL: Uh, it would help if the fans showed up and came to the games. That's why the team didn't make money, because the fans weren't there, supporting the team. That's what happens when the fans don't support --

DW: But you guys weren't winning.
CL: Right. It goes hand-in-hand, though. It definitely goes hand-in-hand. Yeah, I feel sorry for them. I wish we were all still there, that we had won the World Series in '07, come back and won it again last year and were going to win it this year. That's not reality. That's not...It's a business. It's a total business.

DW: Many Tribe fans, and other observers, think you began to grind an ax on management when you were sent down to Class AAA Buffalo in 2007 -- two years removed from an 18-win season -- and that that was the beginning of the end. True?
CL: No. Not at all. I wasn't upset at anyone. They were in position to go to the postseason and potentially win a World Series and were arguably one game away from doing that. Their concern was not whether they're making me happy, it was trying to get to the postseason and winning a World Series, as it should be. I was not getting the results I expected out of myself. You can look at the stats. They were black and white.

Obviously, I didn't want to go to Triple-A. But you have to make the best of the situation. I didn't want to be a major leaguer sent to Triple-A who's bitter and mad at the world. I've seen that before, and I didn't want to be that guy. I tried to do everything they asked me to do, and I expected to get back to pitching well, to get back to Cleveland and help the team get in position to win the World Series. It didn't work out that way.

DW: You pitched out of the bullpen four times in September and were not on any postseason roster. Still not bitter?
CL: No. In the long run, I think (what happened in 2007) motivated me to push that much harder in the offseason and prove everybody wrong. I wasn't mad at anybody or anything. I felt like they had kind of changed their views on me as a pitcher, and I wanted to prove that that wasn't right, that it wasn't the real me.

DW: So when you say they changed their view of you, and that you wanted to prove people wrong -- that's not indicative of grinding an ax?
CL: No. That was the Indians doing a business move. They were trying to win a World Series. That's what it's all about. They viewed me going to Triple-A and replacing me with someone else as making the team better. That's their prerogative.

DW: As objectively as you could view it, did you think the Cleveland team that broke camp this spring would contend?
CL: I thought our ballclub was a lot better than it turned out to be.

DW: What went wrong?
CL: We figured out how to lose every way possible, it seemed like. What made it the toughest is, it wasn't one thing. It wasn't something you could put your finger on and say, 'This is what you need to get better at.' It was one thing one day, something else the next. For whatever reason, we weren't playing complete baseball.
http://www.cleveland.com/dman/index.ssf/2009/08/exindian_lee_talks_about_great.html
 
He sure is brutally honest, no sugar coating.
 
Looks like DW was trying to bait Cliff on some of those questions...
 
Looks like DW was trying to bait Cliff on some of those questions...

I wish he'd have asked more Wedge-specific questions. I really don't think it would hurt to get some of these players to make some statements that force the issue.

It seems like Shap is close enough w/ Wedge that we're looking at his management into the near future. I'll take pretty much anything to get him the hell out of town. There's too much wasted talent on the team.
 
I like the direct answers...
 
DW: Do you feel bad for the fans who see the core of their team traded, fans who wonder, 'Why can't Cliff Lee and Victor Martinez still be around in 2010, to try to make another run at it?'

CL: Uh, it would help if the fans showed up and came to the games. That's why the team didn't make money, because the fans weren't there, supporting the team. That's what happens when the fans don't support

What a dick. Sorry 40,000 fans didn't go to watch one of the worst teams in baseball every night. The Indians should consider themselves lucky that 20,000 still show up.

If fan attendance matched the performance on the field, the Tribe would have about 5000 people showing up every night.

I have hated Cliff ever since he tipped his cap to the fans when they booed him off the field. It was just a bitch move. CC got booed a lot at the beginning of last season and he actually handled it like a man, he said himself that he should be getting booed.

Thanks for showing up when it didn't matter Cliff. We could have really used you in 2007 when you were crying about the fans booing you while you were in the minors.
 
Clevelanders have shown up in droves to watch a horrible Browns team over the last 10 years. Winning or losing, good players or bad, nothing seemed to have an impact on whether fans showed up.

It also begs the question then, if Cleveland fans wanted to see good/winning baseball, they would have shown up on nights that CC or Lee pitched. While the team was mediocre, you stood a good chance to see a win that night, not to mention also getting to watch one of the top pitchers in baseball. Let me put it to you this way- St. Louis fans would have shown up for those kinds of games. But Cleveland fans just aren't that good of baseball fans.

I am not saying Cleveland sports fans don't know baseball or anything like that, but Lee has a point. The fans have not supported this team in the last 8 years regardless of whether they have won or not. Cleveland fans show they will support a continous, unequivocal winner. This is why Cleveland is behind the Cavs right now the way they are. Seems to be the 'way it is' in a football town with a sliding economy.
 
Didn't CC flip off the fans or tell them to fuck off one time ?

My favorite was a couple years ago when Cliff Lee drilled Sosa in the head in Texas and Victor got pissed.. :chuckles:
 
Didn't CC flip off the fans or tell them to fuck off one time ?

My favorite was a couple years ago when Cliff Lee drilled Sosa in the head in Texas and Victor got pissed.. :chuckles:

I don't remember ever seeing that, but maybe he did, I don't know. I was at a couple games when CC got booed off the field and he just looked down and walked off like a man......

My favorite Cliff moment was I believe last season vs Texas...... he thought he struck someone out, but the ump called it a ball and Cliff was pissed...... I think he ended up giving up a HR or a double or something in that at bat and it ended up tying the game.

Anyways, the whole next inning they showed Cliff in the dugout pacing and yelling and his face was as red as it can get.

It was hilarious.
 
Clevelanders have shown up in droves to watch a horrible Browns team over the last 10 years. Winning or losing, good players or bad, nothing seemed to have an impact on whether fans showed up.

It also begs the question then, if Cleveland fans wanted to see good/winning baseball, they would have shown up on nights that CC or Lee pitched. While the team was mediocre, you stood a good chance to see a win that night, not to mention also getting to watch one of the top pitchers in baseball. Let me put it to you this way- St. Louis fans would have shown up for those kinds of games. But Cleveland fans just aren't that good of baseball fans.

I am not saying Cleveland sports fans don't know baseball or anything like that, but Lee has a point. The fans have not supported this team in the last 8 years regardless of whether they have won or not. Cleveland fans show they will support a continous, unequivocal winner. This is why Cleveland is behind the Cavs right now the way they are. Seems to be the 'way it is' in a football town with a sliding economy.

I think the problem with the Indians is:

(1) The particular period of time that they were bad for

(2) The LENGTH of time that they were bad for

Here's the way I see it...

The Browns will always be popular for the opposite reasons. They were THE BEST in the 50's and 60's. A lot of those fans who were children then, are now in their 60's and 70's. They grew up with a winner. They still support the team but that's not who you see at the games now. The people you see at the games are their children. The championship Browns era fans grew up extremely enthusiastic about the Browns because of their pure greatness and raised children who then felt the same way.

While the Browns weren't very good in the 70's, they became good again in the 80's...very good. Kind of like how the Charger have been over the last 10 years: not quite Super Bowl quality, but always right there and always fun to watch. So the next set of good Browns teams came when the championship era group had kids. Browns love was instilled again. Those people are all still fans because they grew up with a winner. That's the dawg pound group.

So when it comes to the Browns, you have two generations of fans that were completely hooked on a winning product. They're the ones who have kept the Browns afloat for so long.

Where the Browns are at risk of losing fans is with the dawg pound generation's children. They/we are growing up with some horrible, horrible football and their parents aren't enthusiastic enough to get them hooked like they once were.

As for the Indians...they were terrible from the 60's through the early 90's. They alienated the same two generations that grew up on good Browns football and thus don't have the fan support. The kids who grew up with the mid-90's teams ARE generally hooked on the Indians because we grew up with a winner. But our parents generally aren't as into them and didn't get into them until that awesome run. But by that point the loyalties were established.

A team has to get hot at the right time. IMO the key to making money is to hook two generations right before they can start spending money of their own. You have to be raised on a winner, because your parents loyalties can only go so far.
 
I think the problem with the Indians is:

(1) The particular period of time that they were bad for

(2) The LENGTH of time that they were bad for

Here's the way I see it...

The Browns will always be popular for the opposite reasons. They were THE BEST in the 50's and 60's. A lot of those fans who were children then, are now in their 60's and 70's. They grew up with a winner. They still support the team but that's not who you see at the games now. The people you see at the games are their children. The championship Browns era fans grew up extremely enthusiastic about the Browns because of their pure greatness and raised children who then felt the same way.

While the Browns weren't very good in the 70's, they became good again in the 80's...very good. Kind of like how the Charger have been over the last 10 years: not quite Super Bowl quality, but always right there and always fun to watch. So the next set of good Browns teams came when the championship era group had kids. Browns love was instilled again. Those people are all still fans because they grew up with a winner. That's the dawg pound group.

So when it comes to the Browns, you have two generations of fans that were completely hooked on a winning product. They're the ones who have kept the Browns afloat for so long.

Where the Browns are at risk of losing fans is with the dawg pound generation's children. They/we are growing up with some horrible, horrible football and their parents aren't enthusiastic enough to get them hooked like they once were.

As for the Indians...they were terrible from the 60's through the early 90's. They alienated the same two generations that grew up on good Browns football and thus don't have the fan support. The kids who grew up with the mid-90's teams ARE generally hooked on the Indians because we grew up with a winner. But our parents generally aren't as into them and didn't get into them until that awesome run. But by that point the loyalties were established.

A team has to get hot at the right time. IMO the key to making money is to hook two generations right before they can start spending money of their own. You have to be raised on a winner, because your parents loyalties can only go so far.

Very well said. I coudn't agree more.

Let's not forget that the Indians' franchise has been in Cleveland for over 100 years. In the first half of the 20th Century, their winning percentage was only bested by the Yankees. The Indians and the Yankees used to be great rivals. The generation that remembers those glory days is fading.

I think that is part of the problem also. Who is our rival nowadays? Sure, you can say the obvious, all the Central Division teams, maybe Chicago or Minnesota in particular. But because of the MLB scheduling to accomodate inter-league play, we only play the AL East and West two series per year. We have a nice little rivaly of sorts with Cincy, but I would happily give up on that to play the AL East and West more times in a season.

Regarding Lee, he has always had a problem saying the right thing when interviewed. I considered that a kind of likable flaw given the type of competitor he is. Somehow that worked for me. But another thing to remember is that he is likely repeating the things that he was hearing within the organization internally. He should be able to differentiate between the two, but Cliff doesn't have that filter fully developed. I don't think he's used to being in the spotlight.
 
Can we all just admit that the Indians wouldn't get good crowds even if they consistently won? Special circumstances led to the 90s sellouts... the Browns left and we happened to have hall of famers and all-stars at every position. We had a chance to prove that we're a good baseball town... we had the best record in baseball in 2007 and still were seeing crowds of 20,000 at the end of the season in a pennant race. When the Browns came back, the Indians backing left. I have absolutely no problem with Cliff Lee calling out the Indians fans.
 
Didn't CC flip off the fans or tell them to fuck off one time ?

My favorite was a couple years ago when Cliff Lee drilled Sosa in the head in Texas and Victor got pissed.. :chuckles:

Not that I remember, though CC is a fiery guy I don't remember him ever taking out his frustrations on the crowd. Are you maybe thinking of when Jack McDowell flipped off the Yankees faithful? :chuckles:
 
I have to say Lee's shot(if you want to perceive it that way) at the fans is justified. He could have been humble and gone the route of praising the fans to make us feel all nice and fuzzy but the fact is he's right. If Clevelanders were packing the house at least a couple times a week, our team would be in a better position. Not just in terms of payroll but it's just plain dumb to think a team doesn't feed off the energy of a big, excited crowd.

I think that in some ways, the fact that as fans we're so desperate for a championship hurts our overall "fandom". What I mean by that is when we have a team that's really, really good to watch with one or more great players and there's a good storyline that follows the team(a "local boy made good" story especially makes us cream our pants) we put our eggs all in one basket. Personally, I'm so hyped up about the Cavs that if the Indians or Browns suck(which they do), it doesn't really bother me as much as it would normally because I want to know what it's like to win a championship. Since they both stink, I'm already kind of looking past the baseball and football season to the Cavs. I'll admit that I'm a "bandwagon" fan in that while I love all three teams equally(at least that's what I tell the Browns:chuckles:) and will always follow them in some capacity, if I smell championship potential in one I'm all over that team. My desire to see a team "break the curse" sometimes overshadows the enjoyment I get from just watching a Cleveland team.

That's just me though and it's hard to measure emotional investment but I think once one of the three teams wins a championship, I'll be able to be more relaxed and divide my attention more evenly regardless of who's winning.

Also, baseball in America is just in the crapper in general. There's no buzz, no excitement. Kids aren't into it like they were even 10 years ago and I don't think parents are exactly pushing them into sports where the guys they're supposed to emulate are mostly on roids. Bud Selig couldn't have handled this any worse and I think baseball is in for a worse crash than it was headed towards before the home run era.



Wow, never underestimate the ranting ability of a man bored at work 3 espressos deep. :rolleyes:

Spot on.

I think it is gonna be REALLY interesting when one of these teams finally wins a championship to see how the collective attitudes of Clevelanders changes.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top