• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

How the Indians got so bad

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

tedginnjr

NBA Starter
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
4,117
Points
113
BP Daily: No longer on the warpath

Bullpen failures and player development problems have doomed the Indians


By Jay Jaffe
Baseball Prospectus

Two seasons after they fell one win shy of a pennant, the Cleveland Indians are flying the white flag. For the second straight summer, they've traded the reigning AL Cy Young Award winner in exchange for prospects, this after a squad projected to win its division fell flat on its face out of the gate. Cliff Lee's trade to the Phillies was just one of five forward-looking deals general manager Mark Shapiro made to dismantle this lost Tribe, with Mark DeRosa, Victor Martinez, Ryan Garko and Rafael Betancourt leaving town as well.

It's tough to quantify disappointment, at least beyond 61 years without a world championship. Although we've already given the Indians their equivalent of a Golden Raspberry on the PECOTA front, that system's relatively brief existence (since 2003) requires turning to a different forecasting method for a deeper historical perspective.

Years ago, Baseball Prospectus co-founder Rany Jazayerli demonstrated that a team's recent history -- its three previous years of performance, to be exact -- is useful in predicting its winning percentage. Along the way, he confirmed a 20-year-old Bill James finding called the whirlpool principle, the strong tendency of teams to be drawn toward .500, a concept that's more commonly known as regression to the mean. Based upon a multivariate regression analysis of 70 years of historical data, the formula Jazayerli emerged with was Y = .1557 + (.4517 x X1) + (.1401 x X2) + (.0968 x X3), where X1, X2, and X3 are the team's winning percentages from one, two and three years ago, respectively.

Whereas PECOTA uses performance and playing-time projections, Jazayerli's formula is blind to a team's personnel, skills and deployment, but it's available and effective over a much longer historical range. Via this formula, the Indians were projected to post a .511 winning percentage this season after showings of .481, .593 and .500 the past three years. As such, they rank as this year's second-most-disappointing team, even given their modest projections:

What a disappointment
The 15 most disappointing teams in MLB, via BP co-founder Rany Jazayerli's theory.

Team Projected Actual +/-
Washington Nationals .427 .314 -.113
Cleveland Indians .511 .419 -.092
Arizona Diamondbacks .508 .438 -.069
Kansas City Royals .462 .394 -.069
Oakland Athletics .487 .423 -.064
New York Mets .538 .481 -.057
San Diego Padres .460 .406 -.055
Cincinnati Reds .472 .433 -.039
Toronto Blue Jays .519 .486 -.034
Minnesota Twins .525 .495 -.030
Milwaukee Brewers .523 .495 -.028
Baltimore Orioles .448 .423 -.025
Houston Astros .509 .495 -.014
Chicago White Sox .518 .509 -.009
Pittsburgh Pirates .441 .433 -.009

That 92-point shortfall would rank as the 22nd-highest of the poststrike era (1996 onward), while the Nationals' 113-point gap is one point out of 10th place. The Tribe figure to rise in those historical rankings given their recent trades; Clay Davenport of BP estimates that their PECOTA-projected record for the remainder of the year dropped 50 points during the past 10 days, even while the team went 7-3.

What has gone wrong in Cleveland? PECOTA's division-winning projection called for a meager 86 wins (around three more than the above method suggests) and a 38 percent chance of making the postseason, casting the Indians as weak favorites over the Tigers. Despite injuries to Travis Hafner and Grady Sizemore, the offense essentially has lived up to expectations: Projected to rank fourth in the American League in scoring, it actually ranks fifth. The pitching, however, ranks dead last instead of the projected seventh.

The responsibility for that showing rests with both the rotation (13th in SNLVAR in the AL) and the bullpen (14th in WXRL). Blame Shapiro for assembling the rotation, which has put up a 5.95 ERA beyond Lee. Although the GM's acquisition of Anthony Reyes last year was a worthwhile gambit that went sour thanks to elbow problems that culminated in Tommy John surgery, his signing of Carl Pavano has brought plenty of bad (five disaster starts, or those with more runs than innings pitched) to go with the good (10 quality starts), with a 5.37 ERA and 1.4 homers per nine innings. Manager Eric Wedge and his coaching staff own a share of the blame for failing to straighten out Fausto Carmona; hoping the sinkerballer would regain his stellar 2007 form after mechanical and injury woes ruined 2008, they suffered a 7.42 ERA in 12 gruesome starts before farming him out in June. The rest of the rotation fillers -- Aaron Laffey, Jeremy Sowers, Zach Jackson, David Huff and Scott Lewis -- apparently arrived from a big-box store where hittable lefties are sold by the gross; that quintet has given the Tribe 36 starts with a 5.73 ERA and just 4.7 strikeouts per nine.

The bullpen has been worse, a major reason the team is an AL-high 7.7 wins behind its projected third-order record (its Pythagorean record after adjusting for scoring environment, run elements and quality of opposition). Poor early-season performances by Kerry Wood, Betancourt (since traded to Colorado), Rafael Perez (since demoted) and Jensen Lewis (recalled this past weekend after a five-week demotion) dug the team an early hole; the Indians already were 4.7 games behind their third-order projection by mid-May. That was around the time the buzzards started circling Wedge, who presided over an uncannily similar debacle last year, when the relievers he rode hard late in 2007 spit the bit. Wedge has presided over three slow-starting teams in the past four years. Although his overall record stands at 540-537, just two of his seven teams have finished better than .500, and they've fallen a cumulative 29 games shy of their Pythagorean projections.

Shapiro will have to answer for his pledge to keep his skipper in place -- and, ultimately, for the drying up of the team's talent pipeline amid years of unimpressive drafts. From 1997 through 2008, the Indians organization produced more major league talent than any other AL Central team, according to the value production standings work that Steve Treder presented at the most recent SABR convention. Alas, an increasing proportion of that value, from Manny Ramirez and CC Sabathia down through Jeremy Guthrie, was delivered for other teams. As ESPN's Jerry Crasnick pointed out recently, Guthrie has been the most successful of the 19 first-round or supplemental picks on Shapiro's watch, but all of that success has been with the Orioles. Among those on the Indians' major league roster, top 2004 pick Sowers and top 2006 pick Huff are among the glut of low-upside left-handers, while top 2005 pick Trevor Crowe looks like a card-carrying member of the Future Fourth Outfielders of America.

Ultimately, a failure to produce top talent from within is the bane of a midmarket franchise's existence, for it magnifies a team's more expensive mishaps, such as the injuries sapping the value of Hafner's four-year, $57 million deal and Jake Westbrook's three-year, $33 million pact. This season is bitter enough given the dashed expectations for the Indians, and unless the prospects they've acquired in recent weeks can develop to cover for the system's recent mediocrity, the team will only keep disappointing.


Jay Jaffe is an author of Baseball Prospectus.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/insider/news/story?id=4376040&addata=2009_insdr_mod_mlb_xxx_xxx
 
That is very informative. Maybe someone can answer the following for me - it has become an enigma to me this season:

Don't we use the same scouts for trades as we do for the draft? How can we be so good at trades, but so bad at drafts? Is it because the draft is more of a crapshoot in that the players have only been seen in high school, college, or international competition settings, and it is therefore more difficult to asses talent than it is for players already in the minors or majors?

If anyone knows the answer to this - I would appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
That is very informative. Maybe someone can answer the following for me - it has become an enigma to me this season:

Don't we use the same scouts for trades as we do for the draft? How can we be so good at trades, but so bad at drafts? Is it because the draft if more of a crapshoot in that the players have only been seen in high school, college, or international competition settings, and it is therefore more difficult to asses talent than it is for players already in the minors or majors?

If anyone knows the answer to this - I would appreciate it.

Lord only knows. It makes absolutely no sense. Also, our Latin American scouts are fantastic while our American scouts are awful. You would think they'd be run in similar ways, but I guess not.
 
The Indians just aren't that good of an organization. Shapiro is terrible at drafting and free agent signings. The only real success he has had is in trading for other team's prospects. Though, even in his centerpiece trade, the Colon deal, he screwed that up by giving away Phillips. Wedge is a poor tactician whose ridiculous lineup tinkering and mind boggling baseball decisions (i.e. playing Garko in the OF) put the team in poor positions. For a mediocore manager like him to be given this many years speaks volumes about the organization's committment to mediocrity. It is no secret that the Indians flameout anytime that they have any expectations put on them (2005 last week of season, all of 2006 & 2008 & 2009, disastrous collapse in ALCS).
 
Everything seemed to be in place but the team isn't just performing. Maybe a coaching shakeup is needed.
 
I think it all started when we got this jackass.

eric%2Bwedge.jpg
 
Take away CC and Lee, and the record of Carl Willis is pretty damn lame.
 
This thread makes me miss:



and the mid-to-late 90s teams. :(
 
The rest of the rotation fillers -- Aaron Laffey, Jeremy Sowers, Zach Jackson, David Huff and Scott Lewis -- apparently arrived from a big-box store where hittable lefties are sold by the gross; that quintet has given the Tribe 36 starts with a 5.73 ERA and just 4.7 strikeouts per nine.

Not sure why they lumped Laffey in there. He's 4-2 with a 3.57 era in 9 starts.
 
That is very informative. Maybe someone can answer the following for me - it has become an enigma to me this season:

Don't we use the same scouts for trades as we do for the draft? How can we be so good at trades, but so bad at drafts? Is it because the draft is more of a crapshoot in that the players have only been seen in high school, college, or international competition settings, and it is therefore more difficult to asses talent than it is for players already in the minors or majors?

If anyone knows the answer to this - I would appreciate it.

The draft is oftentimes about how much you want to pay a player. And the statistical data is not as significant as a guy who's played in the minors. Like a northern HS pitcher might throw in 10-15 games in a season, and pitch 60 innings. With no standardized level of competition, it's really hard to say if the dude is doing his damage vs farm boys or legit talent.

In short, yeah, the MLB draft is a major crapshoot.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top