Since this is destined to be locked at some point, I throw my only thought in here.
I find it very concerning that the Cavs apparently didn't even consider Thomas Robinson. My only thought.
Windy's info suggested that TRob would've been a serious possibility if it weren't for TT. I really doubt that with all the talk about the drafting process and investing hundreds of thousands of dollars into scouting that they didn't put some thought into Robinson. If he was really much better than Waiters they'd probably have taken him regardless of position ala Davis.
Too many people on here lately from Cavfanatic.
Never understood the fued between the two sites tbh
What feud? I don't even know what a Cavfanatic is.
Both of these things scare me.
I'm willing to admit I could be wrong, but I see no reason to believe Waiters is a better prospect than Robinson.
My last thought. The staff has seen TT improve. If he didn't improve they would have taken TRob. Scott said he was the hardest worker and his shot has improved.
They probably thought a HUGE upgrade at SG is better than a slight upgrade at the PF position.
That maybe true but i can't help but remember the wise words my grandfather told me 'you can't polish a turd'.
So you're saying TT is a turd? Or his shot is a turd? Frankly - I don't care if he shoots one handed all the time - as long as it goes in consistently.
His shot, but really i've just set mself a target to get the thread to 1100 pages
His shot, but really i've just set mself a target to get the thread to 1100 pages