NasstyNate
In the Rotation
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2010
- Messages
- 773
- Reaction score
- 729
- Points
- 93
I'm going to flip my shit if Griffin chose a ridiculous overpay of TT over Shump.
Please don't lose Shump. And dear God, we especially can't let Shump AND JR go.
Though I think at least one of them will stay. Hopefully it's both, but for some reason I see one of them leaving for more money.
I'm going to flip my shit if Griffin chose a ridiculous overpay of TT over Shump.
I respectfully disagree. You only let a player test RFA if you think the market will set the player’s value lower than what your max terms would be. As we’ve seen from the market so far, teams are having no issues handing out big-money contracts like candy, especially for a young defensive-minded wing like Shump.He's an RFA.. only means the market will set his price.
This is what we should have done with Tristan.
I respectfully disagree. You only let a player test RFA if you think the market will set the player’s value lower than what your max terms would be. As we’ve seen from the market so far, teams are having no issues handing out big-money contracts like candy, especially for a young defensive-minded wing like Shump.
Why does no player ever take a discount for Cleveland? Danny Green is gonna probably be paid less than Shump and he is way better on offense and a better defensive player. Makes no sense to me
Why does no player ever take a discount for Cleveland? Danny Green is gonna probably be paid less than Shump and he is way better on offense and a better defensive player. Makes no sense to me
Shump is a younger and also a better defender. Shump can guard point guards and some small forwards.
The key is can Shump continue to improve like Danny Green?
Does anyone worry that we're shelling out way too much for zero offense? I love all these guys, but I'm starting to get nervous. We need some 3 and D guys, shooters.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk