David.
Radical Centrist
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2009
- Messages
- 30,919
- Reaction score
- 27,291
- Points
- 135
Eh your point was that mo would be the fifth our sixth option or whatever and they would all need to go down for the last mo situation to happen again. Lyst asked who these five scorers were, and he's right.And my point is that if you take away the top three scorers off of any team, you're killing the team's chances of scoring.
Outside of LeBron the Cavs crushed teams on offense in the regular season with...Kyrie and Love.
I get it. Love and Kyrie are injury risks.
The point is that rather than worrying about what's going to happen if you lose your three top scorers, you add talent around them to lessen their playing time and expectations.
Mo is one step towards doing that. Other steps will be taken.
Chill.
What I've quoted isn't incorrect, but we can't cycle through arguments till we find one we're correct about.