gourimoko
Fighting the good fight!
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,845
- Reaction score
- 53,645
- Points
- 148
Lot of this boils down to Curry vs Nash.
Offensively, Nash never averaged more than 14 shots per game, but those were very efficient shots in his day or anyone else's for that matter. In the years we're talking about, you're looking at about 11-12 FGA / 36.
He's giving you 16.5P / 11A / 3.3R with 0.5 STL / 0.1 BLK / 3.6 TOV
By contrast, Curry 2016:
31.7 PPG / 7.0 APG / 5.7 REB with 2.3 STL / 0.2 BLK / 3.5 TOV
I think Curry might be worth it, and I do think he'd get quite a few attempts per game, given whose going to be protecting the rim in any of these games.
Also defensively, there's no contest between Curry/Nash, Steph is the better defender.
Not saying Curry is better than Nash; but I am saying that in this context, this was my reason for having Curry 1A and Nash 1B.
Offensively, Nash never averaged more than 14 shots per game, but those were very efficient shots in his day or anyone else's for that matter. In the years we're talking about, you're looking at about 11-12 FGA / 36.
He's giving you 16.5P / 11A / 3.3R with 0.5 STL / 0.1 BLK / 3.6 TOV
By contrast, Curry 2016:
31.7 PPG / 7.0 APG / 5.7 REB with 2.3 STL / 0.2 BLK / 3.5 TOV
I think Curry might be worth it, and I do think he'd get quite a few attempts per game, given whose going to be protecting the rim in any of these games.
Also defensively, there's no contest between Curry/Nash, Steph is the better defender.
Not saying Curry is better than Nash; but I am saying that in this context, this was my reason for having Curry 1A and Nash 1B.