I don't want you to trust me . I want you to counter what Information I present with your own clear coherent thought.
If you don't agree with shapiro then don't post him
In the judges order The state of hawii presents three people impacted not just one.
The state of Hawaii also references overall impact o it college universities and not just for current students but future students and their families.
Shapiros take is a mischaracterization.
Which concept are you disagreeing with
@David?
That Executive orders aren't laws?
if so present evidence to show the contrary. the shapiro article doesn't do that.
That States has the right to sure the federal government ?
If you disagree with that please show evidence to the contrary.
The shapiro article doesn't refute that.
The Judges order clearly states that the original order was part of the temporary injunction.
I mean I am not sure what you are countering me upon or what information your choosing to not trust or trust.
I just asked that you read the judges order yourself.
What was the point of posting the Shapiro article again? there are no facts presented. it is an inflammatory editorial and the author misrepresents the truth to make his point.
I'm not posting on here to debate what this or that reporter said. I am posting here on the EO and the following litigation. based on the facts.
I mean if your not willing to form your own opinion. or just trying to bait people into a generic article perhaps this isn't the best thread for you.
I don't want to discuss Be Shapiros opinions. if I did I would e mail him. if you want to discuss your opinions or god forbid do some research because if your gonna blindly follow what someone from he press says then I am not sure what your trying to do other than make a thread about the Immigration EO and court litigation more about what Ben Shapiro said.
no one on here needs
@David to trust them or believe them.