gourimoko
Fighting the good fight!
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,845
- Reaction score
- 53,645
- Points
- 148
Yes.
Do you disagree that science is studying the observable?
Well... mostly. But something tells me you consider the "observable" as things you can physically see with your own eyes; when in fact, "observable" means something that can in fact be determined to exist or not; even if that determination might be exceptionally difficult to ever do, or, the determination must be inferred through reason.
For example, we can't observe the interior of black holes (and tell anyone about the experience after the fact), and yet, we use region as a source of understanding the entire universe in much of cosmology by way of reasoning about the fundamental laws of nature and how they interact..
So why do you disagree with my assertion about Creation?