- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
- Messages
- 8,717
- Reaction score
- 7,121
- Points
- 113
It's not about talent. The Pacers do not compare on the talent board, but they sure kicked our butts.
Team shows up with a terrible defensive scheme, no intensity, unprepared for the physicality of playoff NBA.. this is clearly a leadership problem. You can throw shade at James, but what made the bulls great, was that they got max effort out of their other assets, Pippen of course, but also Rodman and similar role players.
This team was better in its first two games, than it is after two months of coaching. It's just a fact..
I still think they beat the Pacers, but obviously not in four. But I am worried about Philly. They have that talent some of you are talking about, and they are playing with enthusiasm.
And for the record, Cedi is a better choice than Green, but in garbage time he was achuckin..if he wants to break in, he needs to show composure even when the game is already over..
Team shows up with a terrible defensive scheme, no intensity, unprepared for the physicality of playoff NBA.. this is clearly a leadership problem. You can throw shade at James, but what made the bulls great, was that they got max effort out of their other assets, Pippen of course, but also Rodman and similar role players.
This team was better in its first two games, than it is after two months of coaching. It's just a fact..
I still think they beat the Pacers, but obviously not in four. But I am worried about Philly. They have that talent some of you are talking about, and they are playing with enthusiasm.
And for the record, Cedi is a better choice than Green, but in garbage time he was achuckin..if he wants to break in, he needs to show composure even when the game is already over..