Lee
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,375
- Reaction score
- 62,458
- Points
- 148
Baker is never going to have the elusiveness that a guy like Wilson or Murray possess. There are plenty of young QBs right now who get to buy their processing ability more time by using their legs. That's not Baker. "Fair" or not, he needs to understand his rollouts and scrambles should end in a pass, not breaking off a positive run. He therefore just has to become better at reading the defense and anticipating the passing windows. He has to be faster than a Lamar Jackson or a Josh Allen because he isn't that type of runner.
Some posters jump to "get rid of Baker for a guy who can do it all." Some posters jump to "Don't blame Baker for being Baker." Unfortunately, neither answer is going to get the Browns to a meaningful playoff run. He has to be better in his weaknesses that are indeed under his power to improve.
100% agree. But I see huge improvement through the year, I see the potential. I also see the foot work issues and the lack of accuracy about 30% of the time. I think the footwork and accuracy can be worked on, but I don't think he is ever as accurate as Brees.. but Brees didn't have a 70% season until year 10, in fact, he was only above 65% once in his first 9 years.
Like I said, Mahommes has ruined how we evaluate QB's. Brady and Wilson won SB early BEFORE they became all time greats because of defense and running game. I just think we are way too harsh on Baker who is in his 3rd year and his 4th offense.