2019-2020 Cavaliers fantasy trade thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

NMCav

Sixth Man
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
2,203
Points
113
The Cavs apparently have an interest in Andre Drummond. Drummond has 2 years left on his contract. He could be the big man we need after TT walks, or is traded.
We would need to give some expiring contracts like Knight and maybe Delly. But maybe this is where we move Sexton.
He has a player option he doesn't have 2 years left on his deal. He didn't want to play for the Cavaliers when he was in the draft. Zero reason for us to trade anything for him.
 

cabs

Sixth Man
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
1,001
Points
113
Would Utah entertain a Love for Conley + first swap + young piece? Conley doesnt fit with them and Love would be great next to a player like Gobert imo. Can also turn Bogdanovich into a 6th man.
 

Man Called X

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
15,401
Reaction score
18,421
Points
123
Would Utah entertain a Love for Conley + first swap + young piece? Conley doesnt fit with them and Love would be great next to a player like Gobert imo. Can also turn Bogdanovich into a 6th man.
Honestly, I think Conley is just about done. He's looked terrible all season. And not just because of the nagging hamstring. His shot has been beyond awful. I think all the injuries are catching up to him.
 

cabs

Sixth Man
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
1,001
Points
113
I’ve seen Aaron Gordon for Sexton on twitter, not the biggest AG fan but it kinda makes sense for both teams. Magic can hide sextons defense a lot better than us and we could use a plus defender that allows Cedi to never play PF. We’d need to draft a skilled C though
 

I'mWithDan

"Straight Cash Homie"
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
7,831
Reaction score
12,701
Points
123
I’ve seen Aaron Gordon for Sexton on twitter, not the biggest AG fan but it kinda makes sense for both teams. Magic can hide sextons defense a lot better than us and we could use a plus defender that allows Cedi to never play PF. We’d need to draft a skilled C though
I'd honestly rather have a 1st round pick than Aaron Gordon. If the aim is to trade Sexton and build around Garland, that's fine.....but Gordon is an incredibly average NBA player. Maybe better than average but wildly inconsistent.

This is his 6th NBA season and he's honestly not any better than he was in his 3rd. He's really plateaued as a player and at this point, it's difficult to expect him to be much better.
 

NMCav

Sixth Man
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
2,203
Points
113
I'd honestly rather have a 1st round pick than Aaron Gordon. If the aim is to trade Sexton and build around Garland, that's fine.....but Gordon is an incredibly average NBA player. Maybe better than average but wildly inconsistent.

This is his 6th NBA season and he's honestly not any better than he was in his 3rd. He's really plateaued as a player and at this point, it's difficult to expect him to be much better.
Really think with better coaching and a more defined role Gordon can develop further. Spurs apparently love him. If he went to SA I could see him taking off. Coming to Cleveland not so much.
 

I'mWithDan

"Straight Cash Homie"
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
7,831
Reaction score
12,701
Points
123
Really think with better coaching and a more defined role Gordon can develop further. Spurs apparently love him. If he went to SA I could see him taking off. Coming to Cleveland not so much.
I guess......but he's 4-5 years older than Garland. If the purpose of moving Sexton is to build around Garland, I'd just rather do that with someone who will hit is prime at a similar time or at least have significant overlap. I'd also just rather do it with someone at the start of their rookie scale deal...from a cap and team control perspective. But maybe I'm in the minority with that thinking.
 

NMCav

Sixth Man
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
2,203
Points
113
I guess......but he's 4-5 years older than Garland. If the purpose of moving Sexton is to build around Garland, I'd just rather do that with someone who will hit is prime at a similar time or at least have significant overlap. I'd also just rather do it with someone at the start of their rookie scale deal...from a cap and team control perspective. But maybe I'm in the minority with that thinking.
I literally said he wouldn't be a good fit for Cleveland... I said he would be a good fit with SA.
 

Trade Deadlne Server Costs

Total amount
$370.00
Goal
$275.00
Donation ends:

Radio

Top