@The Human Q-Tip
I am siding with
@Derek on this argument, but i am looking at it this way.
NBA honestly is watched around the world and basketball is a world sport. They have fans all over the world. Most casual fans can name the best players in the league and the NBA (almost to much) promotes these players and many people know them.
NFL, now they arent a world sport, but you can watch around 12 if not more of the games per season on free TV (just antenna or on NFL.com) as long as enough tickets are sold. So you have access without paying much to be able to watch most of the games. Plus they promote players as well. Guys like Burrows (who hasn't even had an NFL snap) has already sold more jerseys than likely Roberto Perez has and he has been on the tribe the longest.
MLB, does not promote its players (maybe it stems from the history of baseball, but they need to change things with this). How many guys can you name that arent on the Indians? Can you name the AL Leader in HRs in 19? Can you explain why the Marlins are looking to lock up 3B Brian Anderson to an extension? Can you tell me why Bryan Reynolds could compete for a batting title? Most people cannot even tell me who those guys are let alone tell me anything about them.
Also in my mind, they arent changing with the people's lifestyles. You need cable/satellite if you don't have mlb.tv, to watch baseball gamss at home. With the decline in subscriptions to cable/satellite and the big increase to Netflix and other options like that, there is less and less people that have access to your teams games. Turner, who owned the Braves, always wanted his team on a regular TV so everyone could watch them, not just the local people. I saw more Braves games than Indians games growing up in Canton. I often could only watch the replay cause Time Warner Cable blacked out a lot of the games. I became a fan of baseball because of the Braves and my dad, not because of the Indians since I never got to watch them.
Don't get me wrong, I understand the economics and whatnot of baseball, but with what
@Derek was saying, they arent being smart since they arent adjusting to the times. Some places have 4 or more teams blackout even with MLB.tv subscription. They cannot watch any of those games live cause of the location (I will not be able to watch 50% of the Indians games this season because of the local blackouts and i am not even in Ohio) if you have an MLB.tv subscription, you cannot watch any Indians live games if you are in Ohio, and some parts of Pennsylvania. Isnt that what an MLB.tv subscription is for, to be able to watch baseball games? Its useless in a local area and it costs what at least 100 a month if not more a month to get STO. So do you want to spend that much for one station/to be able to watch the local sports team?
Also in some areas, like other posters stated, they have a bunch of teams blocked but they are states away from any pro team, how does that make sense to bring in fans without the ability to watch a team. If I could only watch the Braves, I would be a Braves fan, but a fan nonetheless, but if i cannot watch any team without paying 100 a month, why would i become a fan? You just lost any who could be a casual fan for baseball. You need more than diehards to make a business that large successful.
Derek essentially just wants a way through MLB itself to be able to watch games (even with a fee) without blackouts in the local area. We arent saying for free, just an option to watch the team without blackouts. Also it is something Trevor Bauer complained about in his off season rant, so the players feel the same way as Derek feels about the situation.