- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 20,398
- Reaction score
- 33,138
- Points
- 148
Fields and Lawrence are going to go 1 and 2.
Probably.
I think there is a chance that a team might prefer Fields to Lawrence too
Fields and Lawrence are going to go 1 and 2.
As a Realbrownsfans admin I feel like you have no choice but to spend several weekends in Miami on assignment assuming there is a season. Perhaps you start working on how you are going to tell your wife the news now.All eyes will be on Gregory Rousseau at The U to see if he makes the jump.
I think so too; PFF has Fields above Lawrence for now as well.Probably.
I think there is a chance that a team might prefer Fields to Lawrence too
Probably.
I think there is a chance that a team might prefer Fields to Lawrence too
If we start 0-2 or 0-3 there will be a huge temptation to get the tank rolling, as a poor start will probably mean Baker ain’t the one.
If we start 0-2 or 0-3 there will be a huge temptation to get the tank rolling, as a poor start will probably mean Baker ain’t the one.
If we learned something from the Ravens draft, it’s that you can still draft very well even if you are drafting late in each round.
Who are some guys that will enter the suplimental draft once the NCAA cancels the season?
I would much prefer keeping Chubb the next two years, drafting a RB, and using the franchise tag on Chubb for the third year. That means we would get the first five years of his career. After that, you either franchise tag him for the sixth year and let him walk, or try to trade him.If we decide to move on from Chubb (after next year), I would love to draft Hubbard. In the wayyy too early mocks, only Harris/Etienne are going in the 1st. Things of course will change, but if the FO decides Chubb is not worthy of a long/expensive contract extension (which you feel analytics would tell you no), then drafting Hubbard would be near the top of my list.
That CMC contract really made things interesting.