I am surprised you havent seen any video because everybody is talking all this stuff about him.
I hated this joke the first time.
This one is much better.
I am surprised you havent seen any video because everybody is talking all this stuff about him.
@Lee
You’re a Purdue homer. Is Derrick Barnes actually good or do my eyes deceive me?
I think, as a day three guy... he miiight be my favorite LB value. I’ve seen tape with hand in dirt, blitzing off the edge, dropping into coverage, playing in the middle. He needs work, especially in coverage... but if you put his and Nick Bolton’s tape on and say second or fifth? I might chose fifth.
I think I’d take him and develop him as a hand down guy coming off the edge.
But he’s pretty intriguing just about anywhere at LB.
@Lee
You’re a Purdue homer. Is Derrick Barnes actually good or do my eyes deceive me?
I think, as a day three guy... he miiight be my favorite LB value. I’ve seen tape with hand in dirt, blitzing off the edge, dropping into coverage, playing in the middle. He needs work, especially in coverage... but if you put his and Nick Bolton’s tape on and say second or fifth? I might chose fifth.
Did he miss many games in college? If not, I don't see the issue.
I think he missed part of the national championship season, but no major issues? He did have a major injury in HS and missed his entire senior season, but played 12 games as a fresh so who cares?
Looks like someone wants to push him down.
Shady as fuck how organizations leak medical info about these kids. I saw they did the same with Fields and his epilepsy earlier today.
I don't get this. Don't all the teams already have the medical reports? If so, the leaks are irrelevant to the draft intentions of the teams themselves. The leaks may affect the predictions of the pundits/commentators/draft "experts" who weren't aware of those medicals. But sliding down Mel Kiper's board isn't going to impact where a player is actually drafted.
To a degree, sure. But their goal is to get teams in the border to question it.
I don't get this. Don't all the teams already have the medical reports? If so, the leaks are irrelevant to the draft intentions of the teams themselves. The leaks may affect the predictions of the pundits/commentators/draft "experts" who weren't aware of those medicals. But sliding down Mel Kiper's board isn't going to impact where a player is actually drafted.
I was referring to teams leaking medical information on players who aren't under their employment. I find that practice shady.
It's one thing to confirm a player that you're paying ten million dollars a year tore his ACL. It's another entirely to leak to reporters that a guy who hasn't even been drafted yet has epilepsy. I don't care what the reasoning is, or if it makes sense.