Even if you assume for the sake of argument Jokic is a terrible defender isn't the fact that his teams are always good just evidence he overcomes it anyway?
They were w/o Murray AND Porter Jr. all of last year and still won 48 games.
What is your point?
The question here is Jokic vs Embiid vs Giannis. Are you suggesting that because Denver is "always good" that's evidence that we should give Jokic the MVP anyway (I guess Philly and Milwaukee aren't as "always good" as Denver)