25 GM Thread

Your assumed asking price for Messick is based on the best information you have to rely on.. nothing wrong with that.. It's just that.. imho, his profile says.. PROVE IT !! otherwise their jumping will have minimal light under their feet at the height of their jump...
For what it's worth, I'd rather be watching Messick in the 5 hole than Allen. Speaking of Allen, that's who I'd be trying to capitalize on via trade while his stock is high(for him).
 
For what it's worth, I'd rather be watching Messick in the 5 hole than Allen. Speaking of Allen, that's who I'd be trying to capitalize on via trade while his stock is high(for him).
@CATS44 would be correct in saying that Logan T would have more trade value (albeit slight) than Messick as Allen has proven he can get ML hitters out.. at least one time through the order.. Perhaps, another team can get him to get through two passes through the order?.. Messick.. happily remains an unknown at the ML level.. and.. the reason for your optimism in a potential trade.. no?
 
@CATS44 would be correct in saying that Logan T would have more trade value (albeit slight) than Messick as Allen has proven he can get ML hitters out.. at least one time through the order.. Perhaps, another team can get him to get through two passes through the order?.. Messick.. happily remains an unknown at the ML level.. and.. the reason for your optimism in a potential trade.. no?
My optimism for Messick is based solely off of talent and potential. He can simply do things with a baseball that a guy like Allen is incapable of. I understand that doesn't mean that potential will be realized at the highest level, but an organization like Cleveland's has to give that talent every opportunity if they want to be relevant in pennant and postseason discussions. That's why I value Messick more than Allen who looks like a definite BOR SP. Essentially it comes down to the known commodity compared to the unknown who could prove to be much more valuable.
 
@Gson @Petes999 @CDAV45
@Criznit

Just a random thought....

What type of player do you think if we started a package with Genao/Chourio plus Messick?

I really feel like if we can get that 2 hole/Guy behind JRam in the lineup, we can make a playoff run...
You are talking about 1 Top 100/50 type guy and 1 near Top 100, will get you something. But, what do we really need #2 hitter and SS or CF. You cannot give up Genao without getting a SS. What do we have below him, Tolentino? Rocchio? Mooney? Not much. It is easier to give up Chourio but again Halpin and Watson don't really excite me. But, Rosario is in LC with him but rather keep Chourio too. I would rather give up a Kayfus. I have seen a few of his OF plays and he looks very stiff and lets a lot of things fall in front of him. He is 1B only to me for now.

I saw someone bring up Lawlar on twitter as a trade target but to get a #2 hitter at key position at CF, C or SS is probably not enough for Messick and someone else. Need CF/SS more than #2. Just saying, you can't really focus on a short-term need when Fry could take that role next year Kwan-Fry-Ramirez-DeLauter-Manzardo-Arias-Bo-CF Brito or Bazzana by mid-2026 may also fit that role. Why give up 2 top prospects for a short-term need without solving longer-term needs?
 
You are talking about 1 Top 100/50 type guy and 1 near Top 100, will get you something. But, what do we really need #2 hitter and SS or CF. You cannot give up Genao without getting a SS. What do we have below him, Tolentino? Rocchio? Mooney? Not much. It is easier to give up Chourio but again Halpin and Watson don't really excite me. But, Rosario is in LC with him but rather keep Chourio too. I would rather give up a Kayfus. I have seen a few of his OF plays and he looks very stiff and lets a lot of things fall in front of him. He is 1B only to me for now.

I saw someone bring up Lawlar on twitter as a trade target but to get a #2 hitter at key position at CF, C or SS is probably not enough for Messick and someone else. Need CF/SS more than #2. Just saying, you can't really focus on a short-term need when Fry could take that role next year Kwan-Fry-Ramirez-DeLauter-Manzardo-Arias-Bo-CF Brito or Bazzana by mid-2026 may also fit that role. Why give up 2 top prospects for a short-term need without solving longer-term needs?
If you watched some of the swings by Fry.. he was swinging with authority and power..and it's this year.. He is probably more in the Manzardo area of the batting order.. 5th/6th.. no?
 
If you watched some of the swings by Fry.. he was swinging with authority and power..and it's this year.. He is probably more in the Manzardo area of the batting order.. 5th/6th.. no?
I just look at top 5 hitters next year to put in top 5 and just thinking Fry is more contact then DeLauter and possibly Manzardo. But as said, Brito/Bazzana at 2nd could also play 2nd. Just showing this year's problem maybe just short term in terms of swinging deal.
 
Last edited:
If you watched some of the swings by Fry.. he was swinging with authority and power..and it's this year.. He is probably more in the Manzardo area of the batting order.. 5th/6th.. no?

Don't forget he didn't have a spring training, nor did he get a lot of minor league ABs... i didn't like him up so soon...
 
You are talking about 1 Top 100/50 type guy and 1 near Top 100, will get you something. But, what do we really need #2 hitter and SS or CF. You cannot give up Genao without getting a SS. What do we have below him, Tolentino? Rocchio? Mooney? Not much. It is easier to give up Chourio but again Halpin and Watson don't really excite me. But, Rosario is in LC with him but rather keep Chourio too. I would rather give up a Kayfus. I have seen a few of his OF plays and he looks very stiff and lets a lot of things fall in front of him. He is 1B only to me for now.

I saw someone bring up Lawlar on twitter as a trade target but to get a #2 hitter at key position at CF, C or SS is probably not enough for Messick and someone else. Need CF/SS more than #2. Just saying, you can't really focus on a short-term need when Fry could take that role next year Kwan-Fry-Ramirez-DeLauter-Manzardo-Arias-Bo-CF Brito or Bazzana by mid-2026 may also fit that role. Why give up 2 top prospects for a short-term need without solving longer-term needs?

We cant just sit and do nothing either... hmm...

Cleveland's FO makes a lot of moves for blocked prospects/players that have team control... I am expecting at least a Straw/Luplow type of deal...

Anyone you see maybe on that type of market?

Also, i would never give up any of those three if we aren't getting someone without team control back. Miller had three years of control, that would be the minimum for sure...
 
I don't agree with your assessment of Messick, but I don't know that I'm right either. He's the best LHSP we have and his prospect value is on the rise. Regardless of what they could get for him now my asking price is quite high. I do believe he's starting to hit some top 100 lists isn't he?

I think the Orioles jump all over him if they find the cost tolerable. Same with the Marlins, Rockies and the WSox. The Pirates and A's have enough young pitching to sort through is my guess.

Between Messick skipping a step in Cleveland's normal fast track, his velo going up and his rankings going up... I think his value is above what Gson believes it is...

I still kind of want to see what the price of Westburg from Baltimore would be... Though I would switch him to the OF come next season and maybe even get him some time there this season, but he hasn't played it much recently... He's definitely fast enough for the OF...

I feel like we need to look for a blocked player, who has an MLB upside if they get a chance to play everyday...
 
For what it's worth, I'd rather be watching Messick in the 5 hole than Allen. Speaking of Allen, that's who I'd be trying to capitalize on via trade while his stock is high(for him).

The teams who would take Allen are teams like the Blue Jays, not teams that are rebuilding... Plus it would be prospects in return not a MLB bat...

Messick would be taken for an MLB since prospects are usually dealt to rebuilding teams...
 
Between Messick skipping a step in Cleveland's normal fast track, his velo going up and his rankings going up... I think his value is above what Gson believes it is...

I still kind of want to see what the price of Westburg from Baltimore would be... Though I would switch him to the OF come next season and maybe even get him some time there this season, but he hasn't played it much recently... He's definitely fast enough for the OF...

I feel like we need to look for a blocked player, who has an MLB upside if they get a chance to play everyday...
Would love to see Westburg in a Guardians uniform, but he is not blocked in Baltimore. In fact, he is a key piece of their core. I'm not saying he is unattainable, but I'm saying the cost is most likely to high to even consider. Which of Bibee or Williams are you willing to give because Baltimore is past rebuilding.

I'm always looking for the blocked player just waiting on an opportunity, but they are difficult to spot and more difficult to obtain.
The teams who would take Allen are teams like the Blue Jays, not teams that are rebuilding... Plus it would be prospects in return not a MLB bat...

Messick would be taken for an MLB since prospects are usually dealt to rebuilding teams...
You keep saying this, but Allen is arbitration eligible in 2027 and a FA in 2030. He's a long-term piece for anybody interested in acquiring him.

You and I know that Messick is likely as or more effective than Allen right now so I'm not sold on the idea that it would only be rebuilding teams interested. He's at the highest level of the minors and dominating.
 
@CDAV45

Sorry for tagging you so much randomly lol


This is the type of deal i would expect for Allen...

Blue Jays get
SP Allen
(maybe a PTBNL)

Guardians get
INF Josh Kasevich
SP Macko
C Franklin Rojas

Jays need another starter...

Macko and Kasevich are both coming off of injury... both would have to pass medicals of course....

Talent wise... Kasevich is a pure hitter... Macko is close to MLB ready if you make him a reliever this season. He is still developing his 4th pitch. Rojas is a DSL catcher....

Then Krook released for Bieber/Messick
 
You are talking about 1 Top 100/50 type guy and 1 near Top 100, will get you something. But, what do we really need #2 hitter and SS or CF. You cannot give up Genao without getting a SS. What do we have below him, Tolentino? Rocchio? Mooney? Not much. It is easier to give up Chourio but again Halpin and Watson don't really excite me. But, Rosario is in LC with him but rather keep Chourio too. I would rather give up a Kayfus. I have seen a few of his OF plays and he looks very stiff and lets a lot of things fall in front of him. He is 1B only to me for now.

I saw someone bring up Lawlar on twitter as a trade target but to get a #2 hitter at key position at CF, C or SS is probably not enough for Messick and someone else. Need CF/SS more than #2. Just saying, you can't really focus on a short-term need when Fry could take that role next year Kwan-Fry-Ramirez-DeLauter-Manzardo-Arias-Bo-CF Brito or Bazzana by mid-2026 may also fit that role. Why give up 2 top prospects for a short-term need without solving longer-term needs?
There is no way I'm giving up Kayfus before Chourio if I can help it. In fact, I suspect Chourio's value will lessen as he advances and struggles against more advanced pitching so I'm all for dealing him as part of a package deal to acquire an established, good player who is also controlled for yrs.

Arias has his warts, but name one SS that you think is available and a better overall player. The lack of offensive production from SS throughout the league is beyond amazing. After guys like Lindor and Neto there is a huge drop off. Arias' defensive play, offensive potential and inexpensiveness has secured him as our SS for a minute. I'm not against trading for a SS, but tell me who in the hell you're targeting.

Trading for a CFer is a grand idea, but name one that fits and is reasonably available.

Bo is going nowhere and needs a better battery mate. This team needs a 3rd C on the roster if it has to keep Hedges and Fry isn't that this season.
 
@CDAV45

Sorry for tagging you so much randomly lol


This is the type of deal i would expect for Allen...

Blue Jays get
SP Allen
(maybe a PTBNL)

Guardians get
INF Josh Kasevich
SP Macko
C Franklin Rojas

Jays need another starter...

Macko and Kasevich are both coming off of injury... both would have to pass medicals of course....

Talent wise... Kasevich is a pure hitter... Macko is close to MLB ready if you make him a reliever this season. He is still developing his 4th pitch. Rojas is a DSL catcher....

Then Krook released for Bieber/Messick
Kasevich is a slap hitter with little power so I have no interest in him, and this organization doesn't need another BP arm. Rojas is 18 and a long way off. This is not the type of return Cleveland will want in a deal for Allen. I actually think Allen will be part of a package for the type of player they want as opposed to the type of deal you posted.
 
Kasevich is a slap hitter with little power so I have no interest in him, and this organization doesn't need another BP arm. Rojas is 18 and a long way off. This is not the type of return Cleveland will want in a deal for Allen. I actually think Allen will be part of a package for the type of player they want as opposed to the type of deal you posted.

Allen likely doesn't have the team control a team thats not contending wants. Baltimore maybe, but teams like the Marlins, are gonna want Messick over Allen since they arent near competitive levels yet.

Contenders trade prospects or blocked players for MLB guys... Non competitive teams trade MLB guys for prospects...

It really just depends on the team we are trading with for the type of return. It be extremely unlikely we get an MLB bat back for Allen unless it's a blocked MLB type...
 
Back
Top