• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Ask Bimbo

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
@BimboColesHair

I'm not even going to get one forearm hair prickled about the possibility, but I have to ask for curiosity's sake..

Can you give any insight into what you believe the cost for the Guardians would be to acquire Juan Soto? Gun to my head, I don't think they think Soto + an arm or two is enough to make us contenders this year. Nor am I even close to sure that they're interested in a 2.5 year loan at the cost of depleting the top tier of their farm system.

Assuming for a moment that they're actually interested in that loan, and they do believe they could legitimately contend this season..

Would the Nats be asking for all 3 of Valera, Espino, and Williams ++? I imagine in this make believe scenario, Cleveland hangs up immediately. Still, they have to be making the call for curiosity's sake, like I'm asking here now.
If I'm the Nationals, trading Soto with 2.5 years left, I'm starting at Valera, Espino, Williams and Rocchio. If Cleveland hangs up, cool--they're out of the running.

Edit: Just saw this was in the Ask Bimbo thread. Mods, feel free to move it.
 
Last edited:
I was curious if you think there is a chance Cleveland would possibly make a move as aggressive with Jaison Chourio as the Brewers were with his brother Jackson? Their assignment of him going straight from DSL to Low A.

That said I wonder if Carolina opposed to Lake County weather difference at the start of the season might factor in.
 
What's the latest with EspinGOAT and Hankins? I know Hankins was scheduled to start in ACL but was pulled for a sickness. Espino's prolonged absence is now concerning me. Any news?

@BimboColesHair
 
Bimbo - I just learned this week that Reyes has two options left. Any idea why he hasn’t been sent down to work on his issues? I’m perplexed why they would keep him with the parent club when he’s struggled so terribly.
 
@BimboColesHair I know, I know, I know... but is there any chance the organization would entertain Benson in CF if someone like OGon or Valera plays so well that we can't take them out of RF? Moving Straw to the 4th OF spot with the possibility to be traded?
 
Has Lavastida done any backfield work at 1B or strictly to concerned with catching him up in the catching department since he's relatively new? I kinda wonder if Bo has jumped in the pecking order and they want at least one veteran where could Bryan slot in as 3rd catcher utility RH bat and cut his teeth until he could pair with Naylor.
 
Has Lavastida done any backfield work at 1B or strictly to concerned with catching him up in the catching department since he's relatively new? I kinda wonder if Bo has jumped in the pecking order and they want at least one veteran where could Bryan slot in as 3rd catcher utility RH bat and cut his teeth until he could pair with Naylor.

I am not Bimbo, but I may be able to guess the plan ahead.

Lavastida has experience at SS and 3B in college and Naylor has more innings at C. I think they need Lavastida to get the innings at C, but down the line, Naylor and Lavastida both can play multiple positions on paper because they are better athletes than you normally find behind the plate. Lavastida's experience in college says, he could be a 1B/3B/C type utility...

DBacks run a 3 catcher system with Varsho in the OF normally. If Cleveland finds a young Hedges (aka gold glove type). They can rotate between the three, while Naylor and Lavastida play some other positions. I don't expect it, but if you see Cleveland acquire a 23/24ish year old defensive catcher, you could see a 3 C rotation with Lavastida and/or Naylor playing other positions in an utility role. I don't see Cleveland doing that, but it's not out of the realm of possibilities.

I expect to focus majority of the innings though, especially next season for both guys as Cs and for them to either keep a Maile/Hedges or find another C to mix in with them
 
Hey @BimboColesHair I might be nerding out too much with this and I understand completely if you're not able to answer this question but:

What exactly does the org look for in a pitching prospect that's projectable for velocity increases, as we (you and your coworkers) seem to do it better than anyone else? I recall reading an article a while ago about how fast arm speed with mediocre velocity is a good indicator of room for growth. Are there other specifics you look for beyond that, such as inefficient lower body mechanics, etc?

I remember you mentioned that our recent draft pick Campbell is an obvious fit into this archetype, does that go beyond just the wide range on his fastball?

Thank you and love reading your answers in this thread!
 
Hey @BimboColesHair I might be nerding out too much with this and I understand completely if you're not able to answer this question but:

What exactly does the org look for in a pitching prospect that's projectable for velocity increases, as we (you and your coworkers) seem to do it better than anyone else? I recall reading an article a while ago about how fast arm speed with mediocre velocity is a good indicator of room for growth. Are there other specifics you look for beyond that, such as inefficient lower body mechanics, etc?

I remember you mentioned that our recent draft pick Campbell is an obvious fit into this archetype, does that go beyond just the wide range on his fastball?

Thank you and love reading your answers in this thread!

You know what, this is a good enough question to answer because it’s outside of the box of the normal question I get in here.

All of us have different views on how to tap into the already “tapped out” guy. So I’ll give mine.

For me it all stems from mechanics. I’ve said this before on the forum, but I always live off it when approaching someone to work with; It’s easier to add velocity to a mechanically sound pitcher than it is to make a guy with poor mechanics mechanically sound with unteachable velocity.

Big reason Cleveland finds these college pitchers everyone writes off as finished products year in and year out is because they target mechanically sound guys who need little to no work on obtaining professional mechanics. Shortens the time it takes for little changes here and there to stick and their stuff to improve.

From there it becomes a number of simple (for Cleveland), quick items where all of a sudden a 3rd, 4th, 5th, 19th round pick is showing stuff he never showed in college less than a year ago.

Either optimizing a guys arm path (a solution for fast arm speed, slow pitch speed), taking pitch tracking data and optimizing something grip or release point related, strength and conditioning (the primary solution for lower body mechanical inefficiencies), or changing their arsenal as a whole.

For a players first pro off-season, which I think is the most important stretch in a players baseball career, it varies on the player and the player dev staff for how they gather info and create their plan for individual players.

Some player dev people want you instantly into strength and conditioning and explosion training. Some player dev people want you working with weighted balls before touching a regular baseball. Some want biomechanics readings to work on weight distribution or ground force readings to optimize your explosiveness with your leg drive. Some want pitch tracking data to figure out how to add a few hundred RPMs to certain pitches if possible.

What makes the process fun is everyone is different and everyone is on a completely different plan from everyone else. But finding a way to take all of those different pitchers going down different paths and leading back to the same trajectory is what other teams struggle to master.

If you hit on 25% to 50% of your draft class, who already have good repeatable mechanics and throw strikes, know how to pitch, and have multiple offerings, and see velo increases then you are able to keep churning these guys through level after level year in and year out. Easier said than done though.

I’m not going to get into specifics of what else is targeted for draftees. But if you see a college pitcher who has good mechanics, throws 4 average pitches for strikes and in any count, Ks a lot of hitters, and BBs few hitters that is a good start.

As for the velo on only Campbell’s wide ranging FB and velo increases pertaining to only that, no. 99% of guys who see a velo increase or improve their velo consistency also see velo increases on their secondary pitches. It’s the one hurdle most have to get over the hump on because for most pitchers who are established added velo on a secondary pitch like a slider, curve, cutter, change up, etc = a straighter pitch. Regaining the movement takes a bit of time, but not as long as it would take to take a guy with unteachable stuff and get him mechanically sound where you are helping their arm life and their consistency/command.
 
You know what, this is a good enough question to answer because it’s outside of the box of the normal question I get in here.

All of us have different views on how to tap into the already “tapped out” guy. So I’ll give mine.

For me it all stems from mechanics. I’ve said this before on the forum, but I always live off it when approaching someone to work with; It’s easier to add velocity to a mechanically sound pitcher than it is to make a guy with poor mechanics mechanically sound with unteachable velocity.

Big reason Cleveland finds these college pitchers everyone writes off as finished products year in and year out is because they target mechanically sound guys who need little to no work on obtaining professional mechanics. Shortens the time it takes for little changes here and there to stick and their stuff to improve.

From there it becomes a number of simple (for Cleveland), quick items where all of a sudden a 3rd, 4th, 5th, 19th round pick is showing stuff he never showed in college less than a year ago.

Either optimizing a guys arm path (a solution for fast arm speed, slow pitch speed), taking pitch tracking data and optimizing something grip or release point related, strength and conditioning (the primary solution for lower body mechanical inefficiencies), or changing their arsenal as a whole.

For a players first pro off-season, which I think is the most important stretch in a players baseball career, it varies on the player and the player dev staff for how they gather info and create their plan for individual players.

Some player dev people want you instantly into strength and conditioning and explosion training. Some player dev people want you working with weighted balls before touching a regular baseball. Some want biomechanics readings to work on weight distribution or ground force readings to optimize your explosiveness with your leg drive. Some want pitch tracking data to figure out how to add a few hundred RPMs to certain pitches if possible.

What makes the process fun is everyone is different and everyone is on a completely different plan from everyone else. But finding a way to take all of those different pitchers going down different paths and leading back to the same trajectory is what other teams struggle to master.

If you hit on 25% to 50% of your draft class, who already have good repeatable mechanics and throw strikes, know how to pitch, and have multiple offerings, and see velo increases then you are able to keep churning these guys through level after level year in and year out. Easier said than done though.

I’m not going to get into specifics of what else is targeted for draftees. But if you see a college pitcher who has good mechanics, throws 4 average pitches for strikes and in any count, Ks a lot of hitters, and BBs few hitters that is a good start.

As for the velo on only Campbell’s wide ranging FB and velo increases pertaining to only that, no. 99% of guys who see a velo increase or improve their velo consistency also see velo increases on their secondary pitches. It’s the one hurdle most have to get over the hump on because for most pitchers who are established added velo on a secondary pitch like a slider, curve, cutter, change up, etc = a straighter pitch. Regaining the movement takes a bit of time, but not as long as it would take to take a guy with unteachable stuff and get him mechanically sound where you are helping their arm life and their consistency/command.
Based on the bolded, it seems like a lot of the projection and planning is done with advanced technology (pitch tracking, ground force readings, etc). How much of that is already available pre draft vs after?

In other words, does the development staff have enough information pre-draft to already start mocking up development plans before the pick is finalized, or are the first few days after reporting really key to finding those little holes that need to be plugged?
 
You know what, this is a good enough question to answer because it’s outside of the box of the normal question I get in here.

All of us have different views on how to tap into the already “tapped out” guy. So I’ll give mine.

For me it all stems from mechanics. I’ve said this before on the forum, but I always live off it when approaching someone to work with; It’s easier to add velocity to a mechanically sound pitcher than it is to make a guy with poor mechanics mechanically sound with unteachable velocity.

Big reason Cleveland finds these college pitchers everyone writes off as finished products year in and year out is because they target mechanically sound guys who need little to no work on obtaining professional mechanics. Shortens the time it takes for little changes here and there to stick and their stuff to improve.

From there it becomes a number of simple (for Cleveland), quick items where all of a sudden a 3rd, 4th, 5th, 19th round pick is showing stuff he never showed in college less than a year ago.

Either optimizing a guys arm path (a solution for fast arm speed, slow pitch speed), taking pitch tracking data and optimizing something grip or release point related, strength and conditioning (the primary solution for lower body mechanical inefficiencies), or changing their arsenal as a whole.

For a players first pro off-season, which I think is the most important stretch in a players baseball career, it varies on the player and the player dev staff for how they gather info and create their plan for individual players.

Some player dev people want you instantly into strength and conditioning and explosion training. Some player dev people want you working with weighted balls before touching a regular baseball. Some want biomechanics readings to work on weight distribution or ground force readings to optimize your explosiveness with your leg drive. Some want pitch tracking data to figure out how to add a few hundred RPMs to certain pitches if possible.

What makes the process fun is everyone is different and everyone is on a completely different plan from everyone else. But finding a way to take all of those different pitchers going down different paths and leading back to the same trajectory is what other teams struggle to master.

If you hit on 25% to 50% of your draft class, who already have good repeatable mechanics and throw strikes, know how to pitch, and have multiple offerings, and see velo increases then you are able to keep churning these guys through level after level year in and year out. Easier said than done though.

I’m not going to get into specifics of what else is targeted for draftees. But if you see a college pitcher who has good mechanics, throws 4 average pitches for strikes and in any count, Ks a lot of hitters, and BBs few hitters that is a good start.

As for the velo on only Campbell’s wide ranging FB and velo increases pertaining to only that, no. 99% of guys who see a velo increase or improve their velo consistency also see velo increases on their secondary pitches. It’s the one hurdle most have to get over the hump on because for most pitchers who are established added velo on a secondary pitch like a slider, curve, cutter, change up, etc = a straighter pitch. Regaining the movement takes a bit of time, but not as long as it would take to take a guy with unteachable stuff and get him mechanically sound where you are helping their arm life and their consistency/command.

What minor league park has the best food?
 
You know what, this is a good enough question to answer because it’s outside of the box of the normal question I get in here.

All of us have different views on how to tap into the already “tapped out” guy. So I’ll give mine.

For me it all stems from mechanics. I’ve said this before on the forum, but I always live off it when approaching someone to work with; It’s easier to add velocity to a mechanically sound pitcher than it is to make a guy with poor mechanics mechanically sound with unteachable velocity.

Big reason Cleveland finds these college pitchers everyone writes off as finished products year in and year out is because they target mechanically sound guys who need little to no work on obtaining professional mechanics. Shortens the time it takes for little changes here and there to stick and their stuff to improve.

From there it becomes a number of simple (for Cleveland), quick items where all of a sudden a 3rd, 4th, 5th, 19th round pick is showing stuff he never showed in college less than a year ago.

Either optimizing a guys arm path (a solution for fast arm speed, slow pitch speed), taking pitch tracking data and optimizing something grip or release point related, strength and conditioning (the primary solution for lower body mechanical inefficiencies), or changing their arsenal as a whole.

For a players first pro off-season, which I think is the most important stretch in a players baseball career, it varies on the player and the player dev staff for how they gather info and create their plan for individual players.

Some player dev people want you instantly into strength and conditioning and explosion training. Some player dev people want you working with weighted balls before touching a regular baseball. Some want biomechanics readings to work on weight distribution or ground force readings to optimize your explosiveness with your leg drive. Some want pitch tracking data to figure out how to add a few hundred RPMs to certain pitches if possible.

What makes the process fun is everyone is different and everyone is on a completely different plan from everyone else. But finding a way to take all of those different pitchers going down different paths and leading back to the same trajectory is what other teams struggle to master.

If you hit on 25% to 50% of your draft class, who already have good repeatable mechanics and throw strikes, know how to pitch, and have multiple offerings, and see velo increases then you are able to keep churning these guys through level after level year in and year out. Easier said than done though.

I’m not going to get into specifics of what else is targeted for draftees. But if you see a college pitcher who has good mechanics, throws 4 average pitches for strikes and in any count, Ks a lot of hitters, and BBs few hitters that is a good start.

As for the velo on only Campbell’s wide ranging FB and velo increases pertaining to only that, no. 99% of guys who see a velo increase or improve their velo consistency also see velo increases on their secondary pitches. It’s the one hurdle most have to get over the hump on because for most pitchers who are established added velo on a secondary pitch like a slider, curve, cutter, change up, etc = a straighter pitch. Regaining the movement takes a bit of time, but not as long as it would take to take a guy with unteachable stuff and get him mechanically sound where you are helping their arm life and their consistency/command.
Lot to unpack here... physics/mechanics, psychology, unpredictable growing pains... or lions and tigers and bears.. oh my !..
 
How much does the FO take into account the fan’s reaction to making a move (trade, fa signing, etc.) or not making a move?
 
@BimboColesHair Any in-site on what has changed with Amed the last 3 months? Hitting wise he seems to have gotten hot in June and just kept going, but fielding wise he’s been much better as well. Just seems like a completely different player this year
 
@BimboColesHair Any in-site on what has changed with Amed the last 3 months? Hitting wise he seems to have gotten hot in June and just kept going, but fielding wise he’s been much better as well. Just seems like a completely different player this year
Is it as simple as confidence and comfort?
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top