He would be starting on most teams in the league.
This is an interesting point.. what do you think you could get for Sexton if you offered him for trade around the NBA? Maybe could offer Collin and Cedi which gives you a $12-15 million salary slot you could take back.
The reason I ask, I don't think the rest of the league looks at Collin with the same regard. I think his teammates get frustrated with him breaking the offensive flow to go get a shot or when he misses them on breaks or on the wing. (Vardon stated as much the other day)
I do love Collin's work ethic and the chip on his shoulder he plays with. I love that he improves his game. What drives me nuts he that he will relentlessly improve his shot, his handles, etc., but he's still not improving his general court vision, which would make his game as well as the team's performance skyrocket. It's literally the one thing holding him back and for some reason it feels like the one thing he's least open to improving.
The pass he made to Stevens that ended up being the winning shot, that needs to be the normal pass. It was novel for Collin, so much so it was kind of jarring (and the Hawks didn't bother defending the back line probably because they are the Hawks, but maybe because they figured swallowing up Sexton would lead to him taking a shot that wasn't available) So we know it's in him, but it needs to happen all the time.
The crazy thing is despite their small size Sexton and Garland's offensive games compliment each other too.
This I don't agree with. Yeah, Garland tries to play more of a PG role and Sexton is more of a scorer, but really both need a G who doesn't need to dribble to get his offense going to be a solid complimentary running mate.
And defensively, forget about it. They are not good together or individually on defense. Collin is better simply because he has the motor and the that chip I mentioned.