weepinwillow
the nba: it's faaantastic
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
- Messages
- 4,244
- Reaction score
- 9,002
- Points
- 113
You won't be able to make that choice on paying him, Collin will demand max money as your "best player", and if you don't meet him, or come damn close, he will inevitably "bet on himself" at which point you've lost your leverage.dude, i am against the 6th man and ben gordon comparisons. i think he's a starter, but i won't proclaim that he's a franchise player. he's not there yet and if i'm the GM, i won't pay him like one... yet.
so let's put things in context shall we? sexton is the best player on a bad team, even if that bad team has other lottery picks in it, a rising center they just traded for, and an aging all-star. bar none, sexton is the best player on this team. is he your point guard? that's shaky. he can be if he develops, but you can tell it's better if he just do it occasionally. is he the franchise player you go all out for? nahhhh... IF he develops the PG instincts yes, IF he becomes a monster scorer that he becomes big net positive at the 2, yes.
see... a lot of guys see the caveats on why sexton isn't a franchise player and the knee jerk reaction is "make him sixth man". there is a lot of in-between from franchise player and sixth man and a lot of folks are too polarized to see the big middle area.
Yes, the bet is if he develops PG instincts.. which probably means you need to cut ties with Garland, and/or find a better match for Sexton defensively. I just don't believe Sexton develops those instincts. I see him as a 6th man because he plays a tunnel vision style of offense, and that could be leveraged with a 2nd unit, vs starters where you typically want to establish more guys.
Ben Gordon was a good player, too. People think the comp is mean or degrading, but Ben played a similar game on successful Bulls teams, but ultimately was limited by his height and length.