that would only be appropriate if Sexton actually was what mystery scout claims lolI’m disappointed at the lack of a meltdown over this
Sexton may or may not be an asshole. Who knows. I do know, though, that the scout got one thing exactly right – he's a backup. We simply have to cut the mental cord that makes Sexton the default #1 option for this team. And the faster it's done, the better.
These microwave bench scorers are guys who don't really fit a team concept. You sub them in when your offense isn't getting it done and hope they immediately catch fire looking for their own shot. Then you sub them out when they start taking heat check threes from 40 feet.
There's nothing wrong with a role like that. It's a job, just like any other in the league. But you never make a microwave bench scorer your main guy. You don't fall into that trap.
I don't know that Collin's an ass-hole.. seems extreme. Ball hog? Sure. I don't even think that Sexton goes in "trying to get his" as much as "feels most comfortable looking for his shot"
The Drummond take tells me he was reading the boxscores more than watching the games though. The Cavs "defense" with Drummond was more buoyed by having a healthy Larry Nance.
Weird how that scout didn't realize the defense ruled with Nance in the lineup and sucked with just Drummond.
It was Okoro/Nance/Drummond that was generating so many deflections and steals. We are seeing something similar with Okoro/Mobley/Allen
It all falls in line with "experts" or "scouts" not knowing their ass from a hole in the ground. Sexton isn't without his faults but he's a good guy. The main guy who had issues with him shooting from what I could tell was Larry Nance Jr, who isn't around.
I cant wait for all the complaints to pour in when Sexton gets paid more than they think he is worth and I also can't wait for him to earn it all season and shut them up.
I do however think there is a strong possibility they never agree before the season starts on his value.
I think he is traded at the deadline if they do not come to an agreement this week though, unless Garland gets injured or severely underperforms or something.
Collin doesn't do that though. When he is not scoring well, he takes a backseat. He misses passes, but he does not freeze guys out or take the ball out of their hands. He averaged 57 passes a game last year.
I get the numbers on a bad team thing, but that comes with bad efficiency because "someone has to take the shots". Collin was scoring with good efficiency with THE worst spacing in the league. That is difficult even for a good player.
He was fitting in to the team offense and he and Garland both played well down the stretch and were the 2 best players on the team.
For whatever reason,people has an issue with his dominate personality. There hasn't been one story about him cussing out the coaches or his teammates but people assume he's an asshole just because he's a ball-dominate guard.Maybe,I'm wrong.
It's about results.
If you have a very small shoot-first guard who dominates the ball and you win, great. By all means, keep doing it.
But if it doesn't work, that is literally the FIRST thing you change.
Guys like Sexton are popular among fans of bad rebuilding teams looking for signs of hope. They're cheap calories that taste good but end up being bad for you.
We suddenly have a very real chance to take the next step. Sexton can be a part of it but not in the role he's used to.
No, If Sexton and Garland had better teammates around them or at least healthy ones which they should have this season, we can make good judgements on them as players in the mix with Mobley long term. Right now what you are claiming Sexton is, makes him by default a starting guard next to Rubio on this roster and forces Garland and Okoro to the bench. You cannot have a passive playmaker like Garland running your team or playing off ball next to RR regardless of how short your sg is if he is getting buckets when nobody else can.You know, I don't think Sexton would have much of a market around the league at this point. That should tell you something. Nobody's looking to give a lot of money to a 6ft scorer who hasn't demonstrated the ability to play within a team concept on either side of the ball. In this league, that's a bench guy, as I said above.
The Cavs should be very careful not to end up bidding against themselves here. In my opinion this is a pretty critical point in time – you lay the groundwork for the team that will be led by Mobley in a few years. You don't need to muddy the waters by paying Sexton like a franchise dude.
Rubio is a passive playmaker. Its part of the reason he ended up a bust from his hype. Garland on the other hand is very unpassive about his playmaking, to fault. Its his shooting that is passive. Not your best effort.No, If Sexton and Garland had better teammates around them or at least healthy ones which they should have this season, we can make good judgements on them as players in the mix with Mobley long term. Right now what you are claiming Sexton is, makes him by default a starting guard next to Rubio on this roster and forces Garland and Okoro to the bench. You cannot have a passive playmaker like Garland running your team or playing off ball next to RR regardless of how short your sg is if he is getting buckets when nobody else can.
What needs to happen is Garland needs to earn the starting pg job, and then by doing so will open up Sextons game. We have yet to see much of Garland or Sextons expanded role with good teammates. I see a kid in Sexton playing out of position in many cases and always getting double teamed thanks to bashful back court pairings but most of it having to do with no spacing at all. I mean few others besides Cedi going yolo willing to take responsibility to score. That does not equate to said player being limited to hunting shots but that was his role the past few seasons and he could have scored 40 a game with better teammates. But he is more than a microwave already seen whenever Garland or Delly or whomever you want to plug in was not playing , and even if that is all he has proved to be for the most part to those outside the know, you will see it on his next team, assuming he doesn't get the chance to prove it here. They should pay him just short of a max and anything less he makes them regret it forever.
You could say the same thing about SGA, DeAaron Fox, Zach LaVine, & others. Same for Kyrie before LeBron returned to Cleveland. Point is, you can’t necessarily blame one player for a team’s losingYou know, I don't think Sexton would have much of a market around the league at this point. That should tell you something. Nobody's looking to give a lot of money to a 6ft scorer who hasn't demonstrated the ability to play within a team concept on either side of the ball. In this league, that's a bench guy, as I said above.
The Cavs should be very careful not to end up bidding against themselves here. In my opinion this is a pretty critical point in time – you lay the groundwork for the team that will be led by Mobley in a few years. You don't need to muddy the waters by paying Sexton like a franchise dude.