• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Fallout: 76

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Stark

The Winds of Winter
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
22,085
Reaction score
23,821
Points
135
fallout_76_release_small.jpg

What we know so far:
- Map is 4x larger than Fallout 4's Commonwealth
- 76 is a prequel to all of the other Fallout games
- Timeline sets it roughly 20 years after the bombs fell, not 200+ like other titles
- Multiplayer/co-op is rumored by not confirmed
- Set in the West Virginia area

Game looks beautiful in the trailer. Very colorful. Hope they can execute this well.

 
fallout_76_release_small.jpg

What we know so far:
- Map is 4x larger than Fallout 4's Commonwealth
- 76 is a prequel to all of the other Fallout games
- Timeline sets it roughly 20 years after the bombs fell, not 200+ like other titles
- Multiplayer/co-op is rumored by not confirmed
- Set in the West Virginia area

Game looks beautiful in the trailer. Very colorful. Hope they can execute this well.


My two cents...

Game definitely does not look like anything DayZ/Rust like we were being led to believe -- perhaps the trailer just doesn't give that away.

We can see seasons play out with foliage changing colors, growing and withering etc... So that's new. But my guess is that this is the culmination of Fallout 4's departure from Fallout 1-3 with respect to customization, crafting, and settlements. Bethesda seemed to want to incorporate as much of that as possible into Fallout 4, and this looks like the next logical step -- effectively allowing players to craft even more.

I'd also venture to guess the game defaults to Hardcore/Survival Mode; which is where this idea of "Rust/DayZ" comes from. You probably need to figure out how to survive early on, and the Survival Perk and things associated it with it, like cooking, foraging, farming, and hunting are going to be more important -- just a guess, but I think that's where the "Survival" aspect is coming into this.

Speculatively, I'd imagine Fallout 76 will use the Fallout 4 engine with a newer graphics pipeline. This likely means the game will look, feel and play like an upgraded and modified Fallout 4.

And that's why I think this is really going to be Fallout 4, with enhanced graphics, a shit-ton of mods like Frost, seasons, the equivalent of Nevada Skies etc, and massively enhanced crafting with a strong reliance on survival. I would think the game will likely enforce Hardcore mode and we'll likely see ammo have increased weights alongside lower carry capacities.


...

Off the bat though, I would've preferred a different location to West Virginia for this game. I say that for a few reasons:

1) We've basically been here already. Fallout 3 takes place in the Capital Wasteland, and Point Lookout takes place in Maryland's swamplands. West Virginia is quite mountainous, but the weather and climate is exceptionally similar.

2) Operation Anchorage had us fight in Alaska and we know the Fallout 3 engine (and Fallout 4's for that matter) can handle snow fairly well. Why not put us somewhere that has the full effect of four seasons in survival mode? I say that because West Virginia does not realistically get cold enough for someone decently equipped to die from exposure.

3) West Virginia is an absolutely beautiful place -- easily Top 5 in the states IMHO; but I highly doubt Fallout 4's engine will be able to render and reproduce rural West Virginia's hills, mountains, swamps and forests remotely well enough to justify using this environment.

So with that said, I think there were better options like the woods of the Pacific Northwest or the Great Lakes / Midwestern States.

In the Midwest, Survival could take on a whole new meaning in winter with temperatures going well below zero making travelling well clothed or perhaps in power armor more of a necessity. Similar to Frost's use of radiation to require gas masks, 76 could have used the elements to restrict clothing. You'd have the lakes available for DLC, and the potential to trek into Canada.

West Virginia, given the constraints, history of the franchise, etc, just seems like a bad choice for a new game. Would be better served as a DLC location, IMHO.
 
This game looks great! I can't wait to launch nukes at people. My friends and I have been talking about a multiplayer Fallout since Fallout 3. The trailer doesn't really do the multiplayer mechanics much justice. I can't find a video of the "trainer" videos they showed during the conference but you can catch them in the VOD.

3) West Virginia is an absolutely beautiful place -- easily Top 5 in the states IMHO; but I highly doubt Fallout 4's engine will be able to render and reproduce rural West Virginia's hills, mountains, swamps and forests remotely well enough to justify using this environment.

Todd acknowledges this in the keynote. I can't tell if he said they're using a new engine or not, but he said it's different from F4. It supposedly renders color much better.

I'm pumped!
 
This game looks great! I can't wait to launch nukes at people. My friends and I have been talking about a multiplayer Fallout since Fallout 3. The trailer doesn't really do the multiplayer mechanics much justice. I can't find a video of the "trainer" videos they showed during the conference but you can catch them in the VOD.

All I've seen is the E3 trailer above. Would love to see more footage.

Todd acknowledges this in the keynote. I can't tell if he said they're using a new engine or not, but he said it's different from F4. It supposedly renders color much better.

I'm pumped!

I think what he means is that they've overhauled the graphics pipeline in the FO4 engine; they may have even added HDR support, perhaps. But I'd be shocked if 76 isn't running FO4's engine...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ren
All I've seen is the E3 trailer above. Would love to see more footage.



I think what he means is that they've overhauled the graphics pipeline in the FO4 engine; they may have even added HDR support, perhaps. But I'd be shocked if 76 isn't running FO4's engine...

Yea, I bet it's the same engine, but the game play videos looked really nice. Much better than FO4.

Here's where the game mechanic videos start:

https://youtu.be/LZOfMttL_Io?t=1h1m49s
 
Never played a fallout game, is this a game I can just jump into? Or do I need to start from the beginning?
 
Yep.. looks like they're definitely playing up the co-op, which is smart, I think... Fallout co-op is a great idea.
VATS is probably gone. The footage i've seen from this game looks very good... I'm curious if this is more borderland/dying light/shadow warrior 2 co-op with a fully fleshed out campaign you can do in co-op, of if this is more like Rust where they have many persistent servers and there is pvp.

They keep mentioning survivor game which points towards rust/day z. I wouldn't mind it being like rust, those games are super boring at the start because you are so weak and you constantly have to do a bunch of boring tasks to stay alive.
 
Never played a fallout game, is this a game I can just jump into? Or do I need to start from the beginning?

Fallout is absolutely fucking fantastic and yes, you can pick any of them and jump right into them as they're all completely self-contained games.

The most recent is Fallout 4, so you could obviously start there. The best Fallout, IMHO, is Fallout: New Vegas (like, hands down); but you're likely better off starting with Fallout 4 and if you like it, going back to play Fallout New Vegas and then Fallout 3.

If you're into retro gaming, Fallout 1 & 2 are some of the best games ever made.
 
"You dont lose character progression and arent stuck on one server. Your base and items go with you. Seems to me an improved take on Rust."

So anybody that has played a survival pvp arena game. You can build a base, but then when you log off people can raid your shit and destroy your base. So you needed to join a guild of some sort to make sure your shit was still there when you came back.

Also, if you joined another server, you started at level fucking 1 again.
 
Fallout is absolutely fucking fantastic and yes, you can pick any of them and jump right into them as they're all completely self-contained games.

The most recent is Fallout 4, so you could obviously start there. The best Fallout, IMHO, is Fallout: New Vegas (like, hands down); but you're likely better off starting with Fallout 4 and if you like it, going back to play Fallout New Vegas and then Fallout 3.

If you're into retro gaming, Fallout 1 & 2 are some of the best games ever made.

Fallout 3 crushes New Vegas
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-13: "Backup Bash Brothers"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:11: "Clipping Bucks."
Top