OptimusPrime
Back in 2002
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 11,187
- Reaction score
- 10,715
- Points
- 123
The argument is going to be that the ball wasn't moving as well as it did the previous two games, and Sexton was back for this one, so it must be his fault. That's partially true in the aspect that if he gets the ball in position to score, he is going to score, where the games without him, the ball has to move by default until someone who isn't going to shoot 10-19 from the floor finally nuts up and takes a shot.
It's also misleading because the ball wasn't moving when he was off the ball or when he wasn't even in the game. You had Dellavedova pounding the ball late in the shot clock last night, which is definitely not what he should be doing. They're playing a Steve Kerr coached defense as opposed to the Hornets who might as well be tanking, and the Cavs don't exactly have Red Auerbach on their bench. There are many unseen factors into what happened last night, all of which had more bearing on the outcome than 'Sexton is back, he hogs the ball'.
It's also misleading because the ball wasn't moving when he was off the ball or when he wasn't even in the game. You had Dellavedova pounding the ball late in the shot clock last night, which is definitely not what he should be doing. They're playing a Steve Kerr coached defense as opposed to the Hornets who might as well be tanking, and the Cavs don't exactly have Red Auerbach on their bench. There are many unseen factors into what happened last night, all of which had more bearing on the outcome than 'Sexton is back, he hogs the ball'.