- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
- Messages
- 36,562
- Reaction score
- 93,319
- Points
- 148
That's why I specifically asked where you would draw the line - doesn't matter that we had very little talent, or players are screwing up execution, or there isn't good communication. After a certain amount of time, the coach has to answer to that. But it sounds like, hypothetically speaking, you'd give Woods 20+ years of bottom ranked defenses and fault the players? Is there ever a point when you'd be like, "Okay, it has been 60 years, I'm 95 years old, Woods is 109 years old, and in these 60 years our players are still not communicating right, so the onus/responsibility ultimately must fall on the coach."
Sounds like you are hoping to be provocative for a hard date. Last year, I thought Triplethreat was a moron for continuing to call for BJ Goodson to be benched.
Now, would you ask if I want BJ Goodson to play linebacker until I'm 95 years old? No, that's idiotic. I supported Goodson because absolutely nobody else was playing the position any better for that season. Similarly, nobody is coaching this defense better this season.
Firing a coach mid-season is for tanking teams. Nothing productive comes from it.
At the same time, people who are furious at OBJ fall into the same trappings of scapegoating for a sense of relief. Let's say you cut OBJ today... the team will be worse for this season just as they were without him next year. Improvement through attrition during the season is a myth for the spiteful.
I think fans have become conditioned to think an early mile marker like this one is important for reassessing a team. Well, a little but not to the point of drastic changes in personnel. Last year at this point, the Steelers were undefeated and some called them the best team in the NFL. It's laughable now, but it's a lesson in allowing the season to play out a little more.