No I wouldn't. As I've said before the only way I trade Love is if it is clearly a great deal for the Cavs plus he is okay with the destination. Not sure about the latter with Golden State but the main problem would be the fact that Russell is a just a flip candidate for the Cavs and GS would likely see Love as an even deal for Russell. They paid out 2 first round picks for him then gave him a max or close max contract. I still don't understand why GS went after Russell.
The team that really wanted Russell was Minnesota and I thought there was a possible trade match scenario involving multiple teams where both Love and Russell could end up there and the Cavs end up with someone like Sabonis from Indiana, some picks, and Culver from Minnesota. It would have taken a lot of moving contracts with various teams (the Smith contract would be involved also) but was possible. But Phoenix signed Rubio, Indiana grabbed Brogdon, and then GS went after Russell.
This latter is the only type of deal I would take for Love. He is worth much more on this young Cavs team than a couple of late 1st round picks.
Part of me also wants to see Golden State stuck with Russell now so I admit I am biased there. I agree with the article that he is a bad fit for them. It makes me wonder if they'd be interested in Clarkson in fact