-
Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.
panthers D-LINE vs BROWNS O-LINE
- Thread starter PIP
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 18,494
- Reaction score
- 48,755
- Points
- 148
You almost got it right Cavincali (but you are not on the same page as I) For I never said anything negative about the broncos O-line (you just have your own preconcieved notion in your own mind) All I did was produce an argument in #'s of why I thought Rube's production would be greater based on what has been shown in their previous seasons.
Yet, all you guys keep talking about is the broncos o-line. (but you can't defend william)
the broncos have had one of if not the best o-lines in the nfl for years, however, not everyback will succeed in it IMO. griffin had troubles in it, as well as gary or anderson the second time around (can't remember which one, i believe gary)
Rube looked very good last year, and more so then his carrying was his recieving out of the backfield. A dimenion William and LEE don't seem to provide out there.
In terms of WILLIAM, My point was he had to run that system. thus, his style was a product of the system, not his production per say. but the rugged style he had to play while playing big east football.
BC runs a power I single, very rarely a FB is involved.. The browns attempted that in his rookie year, he struggled at first, and progressed as the season went on.
After that, there has been no sign of revival for william. especially with a nice FB in terrelle smith.
Sorry, I'm just not buying what you guys are selling.
Yet, all you guys keep talking about is the broncos o-line. (but you can't defend william)
the broncos have had one of if not the best o-lines in the nfl for years, however, not everyback will succeed in it IMO. griffin had troubles in it, as well as gary or anderson the second time around (can't remember which one, i believe gary)
Rube looked very good last year, and more so then his carrying was his recieving out of the backfield. A dimenion William and LEE don't seem to provide out there.
In terms of WILLIAM, My point was he had to run that system. thus, his style was a product of the system, not his production per say. but the rugged style he had to play while playing big east football.
BC runs a power I single, very rarely a FB is involved.. The browns attempted that in his rookie year, he struggled at first, and progressed as the season went on.
After that, there has been no sign of revival for william. especially with a nice FB in terrelle smith.
Sorry, I'm just not buying what you guys are selling.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 18,494
- Reaction score
- 48,755
- Points
- 148
I didn't see any valid questions that's why.. hell, you asked the same ? twice, but it was worded nicely the 2nd go around.A Mac aka The Truth said:
MOST of it was basically covered- you asked about detroit, i told you.
and again, when he went miami, he was going for the FB position not RB.. let that penetrate.
he was forced into that RB position in denver- and did he ever produce...
I thought you were about to make a point, but then you said william had a productive 2nd season. he played 7 games and had 2 pretty good games, after that, his best was like 85 yards. sandwich in between his beautiful 40 and 50 rushing games..
This argument is pointless, we are arguing over 3 non pro bowl runningbacks..that at best are average..
you like william
i like droughns
some like suggs.
at the end of the day, I'M from S.D-------TOMLINSON = TRUMP CARD :chuckles: