• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

[Playoff Matchup Thread] Cleveland vs. Boston

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
I think people see ATL and SAN and think that's how you have to play to win because it looks pretty. An ISO just isn't one guy standing around. It's one guy who knows he can blast past whoever is guarding him scanning the defense and looking for a good shot. And if the best shot is him taking a shot so be it. Both Bron and Kyrie are DESTROYING the Celtics.
God damn I miss Mo Williams but Kyrie is Batman right now and Bron is Robin
 
Coming in to the series I predicted a sweep but Boston has been more competitive than I thought.

This game in Boston is going to be interesting. This is easily the most talented team in Cavs history but they're playoff-inexperienced, their bench is thin offensively, and it's their first year together and they're not a well-oiled machine on offense despite their efficiency (they're just so talented that they overcome it).

If the 3s fall next game it could be a blowout and a precursor to a sweep. If not, it's going to be a nailbiter.

Interested to see if the Cavs can kind of take that next step and ratchet their game up to another level.
 
I think people see ATL and SAN and think that's how you have to play to win because it looks pretty. An ISO just isn't one guy standing around. It's one guy who knows he can blast past whoever is guarding him scanning the defense and looking for a good shot. And if the best shot is him taking a shot so be it. Both Bron and Kyrie are DESTROYING the Celtics.
God damn I miss Mo Williams but Kyrie is Batman right now and Bron is Robin

& Kevin Love is Iceman

bartender_161951.jpg
 
So Boston played a lot more Crowder and Zeller last night. Cavs stayed big. Boston's guards attacked our front line to try to get them in foul trouble, which sort of worked, but they lost the game anyway because they don't have Lebron James. Boston looks like they can win a game or two if they can keep JR Smith from scoring. Boston is doing a pretty good job of limitting his looks amd disrupting the weak side ball swings. But even a couple JR treys prevent it from getting close and he's going to hit some eventually. Thomas might be the worst matchup in the league for Delly and Perk has no place in this series at all. Didn't like those minutes at all, but what are the Cavs going to do when Kyrie sits?

JR. He's a great shooter who is streaky. He does seem to have open looks IMO, but they just haven't fallen. I think him being benched by Blatt in G1 really rattled him, and I think it was an excellent coaching move, as JR responded defensively in G2 AND Blatt showed him the minutes. I like the message, I like the message that JR sent back too, without ego. The shooting will come around. It always does.

I just like how Delly plays regardless. He has future coach written all over him IMO. If his 3 ball continues to improve, and he can just work on that floater a little bit more, he will be a Cav forever. And let me be the first to call my it: @CavsSimmy will somehow, someway, be instrumental to Delly re-signing with the Cavs.

If Perk were replaced by a healthy Varejao, we would be golden. Alas, there's very few good matchups for Perk where his Defensive Tackle-like muscle is necessitated, and Boston certainly isn't one of them. Love the guy tho.
 
Yeah, I'm not sure I'd rely on flipping that switch. This game made me nervous. It was a playoff game after all, so we should be taking it seriously. The talent differential is like the JV (Celtics) vs the varsity so it shouldn't be this close. It was like a compendium of all our weaknesses --

--offense often looks confused and ineffective without Lebron or Kyrie playing ISO-ball

--defense is good in spurts but can't be relied on consistently for stops.

--live by the 3, die by the 3 -- if they aren't falling we have a hard time varying our game

--front line cannot score reliably outside of Love shooting 3s and the occasional Mozgov alley-oop,

It's not that we're bad, it's that we should be better. We have two legit superstars and what should be a solid supporting cast, but we are not yet maximizing our talent.

Nonononono. This isn't a fair or rational viewpoint. The Celtics might be under the radar and they certainly don't have our level of talent, but they aren't a bad team.

-They have played really well on the road as constructed, in the 2nd half of the season.
-Their 2nd Half record was good.
-They DID come out fired up, and we didn't match that intensity. That might look like coasting to you, but all of that energy spent gave them a whopping 1 point lead at the end of Q1, and my interpretation is that their extreme Q1 hustle is exactly why they had dead legs in Q3.
-I think the Celts were ready for the weakside passes that we were relying on too, so we adjusted and turned our D into O in Q3, and had some blow by opportunities b/c the Celts were worn out.

I just think people are getting a little bit too nit-picky about the Cavs. Stuff like:
-"our offense is all iso" - That's the best offense in the playoffs thus far.
-Our D is weak - It's been quite effective and the Celts do have some advantages with their personnel versus ours.
-Our 3 balls at 33% is the equivalent of shooting 50% from the 2 point range. Obviously very good albeit worse than usual.

So we are up 2-0 against what is likely the 6th best team in the East. They are well coached, a point which LeBron made, and we should all be satisfied with our lack of panic yesterday.

Like @theSTEREO. said, this is actually an ideal opponent. That doesn't mean he doesn't want us to sweep, it just means that they play hard and make good basketball decisions. Not blowing them out shouldn't be read as any trending weakness in our team's play.

The more I think about it, if we play the Bulls in round 2, I think we are set up to really hand it to them. They are getting a false confidence by beating an offensively challenged team, and we will have more a more consistent mental approach based on our series with Boston.
 
If I were a Bulls fan and I'm not, I would not think they are going to sweep the Bucks..they won't , as I expect them to take one on their home court.
 
I'm really surprised at how well the Celtics have been playing on both ends so far, gotta give them props for playing hard and not backing down.
 
If I were a Bulls fan and I'm not, I would not think they are going to sweep the Bucks..they won't , as I expect them to take one on their home court.
Bulls have been so, so, so lucky that the Bucks are an absolutely putrid team on offense.

Even a marginally capable offensive team would've run Chicago out of the building on Monday if they put up the kind of defensive game the Bucks did.

And now with Mirotic down, Rose uneven, and Thibs maybe with one eye on the Thunder job, call me crazy but the Bulls are looking very beatable.
 
Celtics have played some gritty basketball, but really lack the talent to win unless they play an absolutely flawless game.

http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/celtics/post/_/id/4719066/celtics-need-to-make-their-own-breaks

Alas, each time Boston got close, James or Irving made a shot -- or generated a foul. What's more, Boston's rebounding regressed and Tristan Thompson, whom Jae Crowder dubbed the X factor in this series so far, grabbed two of Cleveland's four fourth-quarter offensive rebounds (which led to a total of seven second-chance points).

The Celtics acknowledged their lapses and used them as evidence to suggest that they are capable of hanging with these Cavaliers as the series shifts to Boston.

"We know exactly what we need to do," Crowder said. "Take away the offensive rebounds and we win the game, I feel like. We're going to go back [to Boston] and look at it, get ready for Game 3."

Stevens knows that his team has been able to compete with the Cavaliers, but he wants his squad to eliminate all the controllable errors -- and do it for 48 minutes -- as to give the Celtics an actual chance to generate a victory.
 
For those of you who attended either of the two games, is it just me or has the Q been surprisingly quiet?

I wnet to plenty of playoff games the first time around and the Q was rocking, but from my impression watching on TV it seemed pretty subdued. We had one of the best home crowds Pre 2010. I hope we haven't lost that. GS's crowd blows ours out of the water, judging from the TV broadcasts.
 
For those of you who attended either of the two games, is it just me or has the Q been surprisingly quiet?

I wnet to plenty of playoff games the first time around and the Q was rocking, but from my impression watching on TV it seemed pretty subdued. We had one of the best home crowds Pre 2010. I hope we haven't lost that. GS's crowd blows ours out of the water, judging from the TV broadcasts.

I went to Game 1 and it was a first round playoff game. The crowd was definitely into it and everyone around me (I was in the upper deck) were very focused throughout all of it. The Cavs are heavy favorites to win this series though, so it'll get much crazier and louder in the next round when they have an opponent all fans fear and respect. The Celtics have played a solid game, but the casual fan just assumes the Cavs will win. When they play the Bulls, when each game will be very important and there's a lot of bad blood between teams, the Q will be electric.
 
Bulls have been so, so, so lucky that the Bucks are an absolutely putrid team on offense.

Even a marginally capable offensive team would've run Chicago out of the building on Monday if they put up the kind of defensive game the Bucks did.

And now with Mirotic down, Rose uneven, and Thibs maybe with one eye on the Thunder job, call me crazy but the Bulls are looking very beatable.

The Bulls playing the Bucks isn't lucky if you think that they could use a series against Boston for the same reasons that we can.

Mirotic isn't badly injured, right? If they keep him out tomorrow and lose, then things get interesting: let him fully recover by skipping G4 and you might be going back to Chicago with a 3 game series on hand; or play him when he isn't fully recovered, and he might not be totally effective or worse (better!) he receives a targeted tactical strike from Officer Pachulia and then he really has to miss time.
 
I was at the 2007 finals game 3 (first ever finals home game and down 0-2). The crowd was going nuts to start the game and was itching to get rowdy, but the Spurs just kept clowning on us. If I can recall, it got pretty quiet at certain points. That is going to happen no matter where you are if your team is not performing.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-13: "Backup Bash Brothers"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:11: "Clipping Bucks."
Top