I would say the actual draft ends up uneventful, but you have to remember the number of trades and roster decisions that appear to be driven by the rule V draft crunch before getting to the draft.
It still may bit us on someone if we need to sign a FA like Vazquez or Zunino before we can find the right trade of others like Miller, Rosario, Plesac... But, it still won't be major loss. It's just sometime a good hobby for some of us to distract from other things in life.
two reasons come to mind...It would be interesting to find out why Battenfield was passed over for guys like Thad Ward and Jose Hernandez. Battenfield performed as well or better than they did at a younger age. I'm not complaining, in fact I'm happy, but I'm curious.
Battenfield would have 6 yrs of control.two reasons come to mind...
1. Club control of the prospect (Battenfield) w/r options remaining.. Control of a prospect has to include both the team keeping the prospect as well as the acquiring team.. Take away a level of flexibility and, # 2 (below).. and a player is left alone..
2. Talent quotient: Does the prospect have the one, two or more tools necessary to succeed. Does he possess a weapon that works, no matter what? Battenfield doesn't..
...character/ethic is really how it starts..
Not to be a dick, but maybe what is is amiss is your valuation? He was soundly passed over by the entire league. I suspect the real issue is lack of a MLB quality arsenal, he's a pair of vice grips in a Snap-On world.. That is just my opinion and if he really has the goods - we should see him at the ML level in 2023.Battenfield would have 6 yrs of control.
He's got plenty of tools so I have no idea what you're getting at.
I said it awhile back and I said it again. Something is amiss here and I don't know what it is. Is he injured?
he's not.. A few of his gun readings were in the mid 90's.. but for the most part.. it's a relatively flat fastball that doesn't spin particularly well.. & stays in a rather pedestrian 90-92 ranges. He doesn't have much in the way of deception in his motion as well.. He relies on pitch sequencing and over aggressive hitters to get cheap outs. As he's climbed the MiLB ladder, his numbers have started to deteriorate.. I would expect not much in the way of improvement going forward, as well..Not to be a dick, but maybe what is is amiss is your valuation? He was soundly passed over by the entire league. I suspect the real issue is lack of a MLB quality arsenal, he's a pair of vice grips in a Snap-On world.. That is just my opinion and if he really has the goods - we should see him at the ML level in 2023.
I don't think you're being a dick at all, but I don't think I missed in my valuation either. At least not yet. I've never touted Battenfield as a TOR SP, but you cannot overlook his performance. "A few of his gun readings" were more than mid 90's as Gson suggests. A few of his gun readings were 98 mph is a more accurate statement. He sits anywhere from 93-95 with his FB. "His numbers have started to deteriorate" is laughable. What numbers are we talking about? There was an uptick with his stuff across the board. The one area where he nosedived is control after having damn good control his entire career. I don't know what to make of it honestly, but I wouldn't quite write him off just yet. Remember, the league passed on OGon too and I couldn't figure out why. Also remember that all of Pilkington, Gaddis and Curry are on the roster and they are not the SP prospect that Battenfield is. We'll see what happens and I think the answers I'm looking for will be revealed in time.Not to be a dick, but maybe what is is amiss is your valuation? He was soundly passed over by the entire league. I suspect the real issue is lack of a MLB quality arsenal, he's a pair of vice grips in a Snap-On world.. That is just my opinion and if he really has the goods - we should see him at the ML level in 2023.
Actually always felt Pilkington and Battenfield were pretty close to being the same "level" of prospect. Gaddis is better and Curry is a lot better IMO. That said all 4 of these guys have that "hit a wall" facet in their current profiles. Curry may get exposed similar to Morgan, Gaddis may never have enough secondary stuff.I don't think you're being a dick at all, but I don't think I missed in my valuation either. At least not yet. I've never touted Battenfield as a TOR SP, but you cannot overlook his performance. "A few of his gun readings" were more than mid 90's as Gson suggests. A few of his gun readings were 98 mph is a more accurate statement. He sits anywhere from 93-95 with his FB. "His numbers have started to deteriorate" is laughable. What numbers are we talking about? There was an uptick with his stuff across the board. The one area where he nosedived is control after having damn good control his entire career. I don't know what to make of it honestly, but I wouldn't quite write him off just yet. Remember, the league passed on OGon too and I couldn't figure out why. Also remember that all of Pilkington, Gaddis and Curry are on the roster and they are not the SP prospect that Battenfield is. We'll see what happens and I think the answers I'm looking for will be revealed in time.
I think all 4 have the potential to have good MLB careers, but clearly they need to improve on some things first.Actually always felt Pilkington and Battenfield were pretty close to being the same "level" of prospect. Gaddis is better and Curry is a lot better IMO. That said all 4 of these guys have that "hit a wall" facet in their current profiles. Curry may get exposed similar to Morgan, Gaddis may never have enough secondary stuff.
Curry's FB movement seems like his best trick honestly... it is very unique and has had good success thus far.I'm not big on Curry. He has little room for error due to the lack of FB movement IMO. He has good control and a hard breaking ball so he could find success.