• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

s Trevor Bauer's TWO YEAR suspension starting on 4/29/22 justified

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Is Trevor Bauer's TWO YEAR suspension starting on 4/29/22 justified?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 37.2%
  • No

    Votes: 27 62.8%

  • Total voters
    43
Status
Not open for further replies.
If she didn't give consent for Bauer to beat her unconscious, and Bauer did indeed beat her unconscious, then nothing else matters. Can we agree there?
Agreed however you didn't read my message above. She was unconscious both time but only 2nd gets attention and between these two hookups there are texts

She is also said to have written: "The pink socks stay ON while cuddling...Buttttt offff [sic] when it's time to choke me out."
----------------

"Never been more turned on in my life. Gimme all the pain. Rawr."
 
He didn’t have to accept an invite or any further contact.



Too far === knocked her unconscious





He punched her until she was not conscious.







Excuse after excuse after excuse.

Guy should never pitch again, as far as I’m concerned. I don’t care about whatever false equivalence to others, I’d be more than happy to take a subjective look at others and make the same determination,

Invariably, there will be others rushing to the defense of abusers regardless of case.


Just tell us when they can play again…
Gotta to love how you keep repeating and hammering the allegation that he punched her, using a partial transcpt of a setup call by the police, when not knowing the whole context, as a fact that is not in dispute.

It is not clearly established that she was punched - the medical evidence does not support that conclusion. And it is in fact in dispute that anything but slapping (that is with an open hand) ever occurred.

What is not in dispute is that it was never claimed that she was knocked unconscious from a physical blow. The unconscious claim that is anywhere close to being non disputed is from choking.

Continue to say that he beat her unconscious if you want, but it is not "the fact" that you portray it as.
 
Why do you consistently put words in people’s mouths like this?

Does nothing for your argument, I’m guessing you do it because your argument itself is garbage.

You aren't willing to see other sides to certain issues at all. You do what my dad does, when his mind is made up, regardless of the argument and facts, you don't change your mind. You aren't willing to be flexible when looking at issues and seeing all sides especially with social issues...

No one ever said Bauer was a victim... All we said was the girl has some fault as well since she invited him back...

We don't have the full story, but looking at all the details we do have, Bauer went to far, but she allowed it, hence why he was never indicted or charged...

And the last thing we stated... We don't like Bauers actions at all nor agree with them, but when it comes to the suspension, it was extremely excessive because people who did worse got less...
 
Gotta to love how you keep repeating and hammering the allegation that he punched her, using a partial transcpt of a setup call by the police, when not knowing the whole context, as a fact that is not in dispute.

This just sounds ridiculous on it’s face.

It’s not an allegation. It’s a fact.

The quotes aren’t fake, right?

“When you came to” isn’t a euphemism. He hit her until she was unconscious.

No one ever said Bauer was a victim...

I explicitly quoted the person who did.


I don’t need to be flexible when it’s simply not required. You’re attempting to be flexible in an effort to defend what is largely indefensible.

Seeming to rely only on projection and contortions until you’re able to find him some leeway and understanding.
 
This just sounds ridiculous on it’s face.

It’s not an allegation. It’s a fact.

The quotes aren’t fake, right?

“When you came to” isn’t a euphemism. He hit her until she was unconscious.



I explicitly quoted the person who did.


I don’t need to be flexible when it’s simply not required. You’re attempting to be flexible in an effort to defend what is largely indefensible.

Seeming to rely only on projection and contortions until you’re able to find him some leeway and understanding.
You lied.. you took a part of a comment out of context and claimed your idiot prize.. Congrats..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-12: "Max Strus Juice"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:11: "Clipping Bucks."
Top