• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Stocks to Watch Thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Rofl. I can't read the article but that's not surprising. Can't have the plebs screwing over Wall Street.

A guy bought 50k worth of stock. What evidence is there, at all, that he was doing so for anything other than his personal investments?
Here it is:

Massachusetts securities regulators want to interview Keith Gill, the investor known online as Roaring Kitty, whose multimillion-dollar gains on stock in the retailer GameStop have made him legendary in Internet stock-trading circles.

A spokeswoman for Secretary of State William Galvin said the office sent a subpoena late Monday to Gill, seeking his testimony as it investigates whether any securities regulations were violated when the Wilmington resident, who worked until recently at MassMutual, the Springfield financial services company, touted GameStop stock in his spare time.

Gill, who holds licenses to sell most kinds of investments and offer financial advice, is required as a registered broker-dealer agent to tell his employer about outside business activities. At issue is whether his online activity laying out his enthusiasm for GameStop on social media was work, or a hobby.

For much of the time that Gill was promoting GameStop in YouTube videos and on an investor forum on Reddit, he was working for MassMutual as a director of financial wellness education. He resigned from the company last month.

The subpoena calls for Gill to testify Feb. 26 before the Securities Division in Boston. The office said it was awaiting a response from Gill; it was not clear if Gill has an attorney. He did not respond to a message from the Globe left at a phone number listed in his name.

Galvin’s office had previously had requested information from MassMutual about Gill’s responsibilities and how it supervises registered brokers, including their use of social media.

Galvin has said that MassMutual told his office that had it known about Gill’s online commentary on Gamestop, it would have ordered him to stop. MassMutual also said it had denied an earlier request by Gill to manage investments for a family friend, according to Galvin. Gill gave notice on Jan. 21 and left his job a week later, Galvin’s office said.

A MassMutual representative could not be reached for comment.

Galvin declined to comment further on Tuesday. Last week, he said the investigation “is not about him [Gill]. It’s about the bigger issues here: transparency and the adequacy of the licensing process.”

Gill, raised in Brockton, has become a central character in an unlikely run for the stock of GameStop, which has been struggling to reinvent itself amid rapid change in the physical retail and video game industries. Gill bought into the company more than a year ago and has regularly updated members of the popular Wallstreetbets forum on Reddit about the progress of his investment.

On that social media site, where he is known as Deep[expletive]Value, Gill has told fellow investors and stock market enthusiasts that he invested $53,566 in the stock. At the peak of trading in late January, when GameStop’s stock price hit $347, Gill posted an account statement showing his holdings were valued at $48 million.

The stock price has since retreated, closing Tuesday at $50.31, down 16.1 percent but still well above the single digits where it was trading just a month ago — and far above the price Gill reported paying for his shares. He has since built up a cash balance of almost $14 million, according to a statement he posted Feb. 3, and still owns another 50,000 shares, plus an options contract for more.

The investment has made him a star on the forum, particularly as its membership has surged in recent months amid a rise in day trading through services such as Robinhood. Many others bought in as the stock rose in value, some of whom were motivated by a desire to stick it to a group of hedge funds who had “shorted” GameStop stock, betting that it would go down rather than up.

Gill has gone quiet on YouTube, where he is known as Roaring Kitty.In numerous earlier videos, he maintained there is long-term value in GameStop’s business that the the stock market has failed to see.

In his most recent stream on YouTube, on Jan. 22 — a day when the stock had risen by more than 50 percent to $65 — he said he was focused on GameStop’s next act.

“I’m so excited to see what is ahead for this company, and now what you’re seeing is the rest of the market, right? They’re getting real excited for what lies ahead — and that’s cool to see,” he said.

The stock would continue its rise for several days before plummeting back down.
 
both are also being sued, not sure how the company gets sued for an employee breaking the law outside of work. But I guess it's a sue the people with the money thing.

 
both are also being sued, not sure how the company gets sued for an employee breaking the law outside of work. But I guess it's a sue the people with the money thing.

This is the investment fund trying to fuck over everyone and everything they can after losing billions of dollars. This isnt shocking. The firm got absolutely fucked in the ever loving ass for trying to manipulate the market, and they deserve every single god damn cent they lost. Hopefully a judge laughs at them over this law suit.
 
both are also being sued, not sure how the company gets sued for an employee breaking the law outside of work. But I guess it's a sue the people with the money thing.


Called this shit.

If you’re a broker, it doesn’t matter what you do outside of the scope of your company.

You talk about anything, you have to notify everyone that you are.
 
They're claiming that he broke the law by illegally manipulation the price of GME and inducing others to buy the stock for the sole purpose of increasing its price.

That is, he didn't promote GME because he believed in the business/stock, but simply to trick others into buying it so he could profit.

Noticeably missing from this complaint (and I read it all) are any of the usual methods of stock manipulation.

No spoofing.

No wash trading.

No rumor mongering.

No insider info.

No pay to play style pump and dumps.


Instead, the whole argument hinges on the fact that he didn't disclose he was some sort of "insider." And that his whole persona that he showed on reddit and youtube was phony. That the only reason people bought the stock and followed his advice is because they believed he was an outsider fighting for the common man. Robin Hood, is what they kept calling him in the complaint.

And their proof that he was lying about his persona is that he didn't disclose his ties to Mutual and his qualifications. That he kept that from the public because if if he told them, then they wouldn't believe he was actually trying to STick It To The Man and that he was just trying to get rich quick.


This is a hard sell, to say the least.


Also missing from the complaint is any citation of any rule or regulation that says you MUST disclose that you are a broker/insider/etc. before commenting on stocks. I keep seeing that it's a requirement, yet this complaint doesn't manage to cite that specific rule or regulation. They cite others. But they don't cite that one.

Also, the complaint is poorly framed. Over and over they REALLY try to paint retail investors as big villains and the hedgefund boys shorting the stock as innocent bystanders. It's a stupid fucking way to construct their complaint. It won't appeal to most people, including judges.

The guy leading the suit shorted the stock while it was "under 100 dollars." They word it that way in the complaint w/o giving the specific price. Why? My guess is because it was VERY close to 100 dollars...meaning it had JUST went on a major, massive run and this dude tried to short it anyway, knowing full well what had already happened to that point to other shorts, knowing full well about reddit retail investors pushing the stock.

Now in the complaint they claim poor Mr. Iovin knew nothing at all about Wallstreetbets. But, again, if I'm right about when he actually shorted the stock (right before it hit 100) there's no fucking way on this planet that a man buying 200k in shorts on GME had no clue about what was happening. None. And that'll come out in discovery.

Anyway, this dude buys 200k of shorts on a stock that's up, at that point, close to FIVE THOUSAND PERCENT from its low, and from the start of the run in January up nearly 500%. There's absolutely no way any person on this earth is going to feel sorry for him.
 
Last edited:
I never feel sorry for shorts, they aren't investing in companies, they are trying to profit from their failures.

The shorts then have a financial motive to spread misinformation about the company they shorted which is exacerbated because they have unlimited loss potential.

Why not use those resources to invest in the success of a different company?
 
Desktop Metal dipped a bit the past couple days and I bought in, anyone else that's interested in them or in investing in 3D printing, they're worth a look right now imo.
 
CVAC came down and I bought it at 110.

Trying be like pros and buying the dip instead of getting spooked.
 
CVAC came down and I bought it at 110.

Trying be like pros and buying the dip instead of getting spooked.
It just hurts to watch your new purchase decrease in value, right off the lot lol
 
It just hurts to watch your new purchase decrease in value, right off the lot lol

also hurts to watch gains vanish and to have all of your funds tied up on days things dip.

Rich is right, though. Buy when everyone else panics, and sell when they are over exuberant. I have trouble with the latter because I'm an optimist by nature. I didn't have any funds to buy more SI or CVAC (I resist using margin)
 
also hurts to watch gains vanish and to have all of your funds tied up on days things dip.

Rich is right, though. Buy when everyone else panics, and sell when they are over exuberant. I have trouble with the latter because I'm an optimist by nature. I didn't have any funds to buy more SI or CVAC (I resist using margin)

Yea I finally forced myself to start selling off my discover. It's up almost triple where I bought it, and I bought it because it had hefty dividend at the time over somewhere around 6%.

Trying to get better about not being greedy.
 
Yea I finally forced myself to start selling off my discover. It's up almost triple where I bought it, and I bought it because it had hefty dividend at the time over somewhere around 6%.

Trying to get better about not being greedy.
I sometimes sell covered calls on stock I don't want to necessarily sell, but which has already gone up quite a bit. Set the strike price high enough I'd be okay selling there (although that feeling changes if it actually hits that price). Can sometimes roll the option out to a later date and up to a higher strike and get a credit.

I had a PLL covered call I sold at $50 when stock was 25, it's almost $60 now, I've rolled that out to $80 through a couple of cycles of rolling out and up. $80 is at end of the year so I can't roll that one out anymore.

Can only be done on stocks you own 100 share increments of. Selling a call when buying the stock is a way to drive down the cost of buying 100 shares.
 
What does anyone know about Elon Musk's The Boring Company?
 
Last edited:

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top