- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 9,825
- Reaction score
- 28,114
- Points
- 135
The Indians would be in the toughest division. I don't understand why they broke up the Giants and Dodgers or why they can't put the Indians in with the White Sox and Royals. It makesFrom CBS sports. https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/...d-to-easier-road-to-playoffs-for-these-teams/
GRAPEFRUIT LEAGUE
NORTH: New York Yankees, Philadelphia Phillies, Toronto Blue Jays, Detroit Tigers, Pittsburgh Pirates.
SOUTH: Boston Red Sox, Minnesota Twins, Atlanta Braves, Tampa Bay Rays, Baltimore Orioles.
EAST: Washington Nationals, Houston Astros, New York Mets, St. Louis Cardinals, Miami Marlins.
CACTUS LEAGUE
NORTHEAST: Chicago Cubs, San Francisco Giants, Arizona Diamondbacks, Colorado Rockies, Oakland Athletics.
WEST: Los Angeles Dodgers, Chicago White Sox, Cincinnati Reds, Cleveland Indians, Los Angeles Angels.
NORTHWEST: Milwaukee Brewers, San Diego Padres, Seattle Mariners, Texas Rangers, Kansas City Royals.
sense for the Indians and Reds to be together since they share a facility and are in the same state.
It looks like they’re setting them up geographically, but if everybody is within 50 miles what’s the point? I get that all the players would be going back to their base hotel after every game, but what’s wrong with an hour bus ride? It’s not like they have anything else to do.
From the column:
To borrow a term from the world of soccer, this is baseball's group of death. PECOTA has all five winning at least 83 games. The last-place team here could have, whomever it ends up being, could have conceivably competed for a postseason spot under normal conditions.
It figures the Indians would get put in the “group of death”.
How about these divisions for Arizona:
Pacific Coast: Dodgers, Angels (LA rivalry), Giants, A’s (Bay rivalry), Mariners
Midwest: Indians, Reds (Ohio), White Sox, Cubs (Chicago), Royals
Mountain: D-Backs, Rockies, Brewers, Rangers, Padres
Last edited: