• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

The Military Thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
You Won't Pass the Army's New Fitness Test

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/you-wont-pass-armys-new-fitness-test-57077

Jarhead biases aside, count me skeptical. The title of the article is:



And they claim that it is:



So they know it is "tough, really tough",: and that "we" won't pass it...but then



Yeah -- that makes zero fucking sense.

:confused:

And then you read a bit further down and find....



So either they're going to be failing a shitload of 45 year old broads, or a whole bunch of 21 year old guys are going to be taking an easy as hell fitness test. Obviously, there's the rare 45 year old woman who will be able to perform better than a handful of 21 year old guys. But as a general rule, there simply isn't a way to make it challenging for the majority if it is age/gender neutral.

@King Stannis

To be fair, I wouldn't pass the old fitness test either.
 
To be fair, I wouldn't pass the old fitness test either.

Heh.

It's just a weird article. They're trying to convince everyone how tough the new test is just by looking at the events, but without discussing the standards. That's just ridiculous. Here's what I think is going on:

The Army's pledge to have age and gender neutral standards is very appealing to the SJW crowd, but it creates very real world problems. That's why they haven't yet devised the actual standards -- because their twin goals of not disqualifying too many women or older soldiers, while also having the test be "tough enough" for younger males, are fundamentally incompatible. You simply cannot do both, and the Army is struggling with that.

My guess is that gets resolved in favor of the SJW goals, so the test is going to be roundly criticized/mocked for being too easy for the younger males that still make up a majority of the Army. To preempt that inevitable criticism, there is a PR campaign to convince everyone how "tough" the test is before the standards are announced. They figure if they can seize control of the narrative that it is a "tough" test, the criticism when the standards ultimately are revealed will be more muted.

I think it's incredible dumb, but amusing to watch from the outside. Probably would be more amusing if it wasn't something that might implicate American lives.
 
Heh.

It's just a weird article. They're trying to convince everyone how tough the new test is just by looking at the events, but without discussing the standards. That's just ridiculous. Here's what I think is going on:

The Army's pledge to have age and gender neutral standards is very appealing to the SJW crowd, but it creates very real world problems. That's why they haven't yet devised the actual standards -- because their twin goals of not disqualifying too many women or older soldiers, while also having the test be "tough enough" for younger males, are fundamentally incompatible. You simply cannot do both, and the Army is struggling with that.

My guess is that gets resolved in favor of the SJW goals, so the test is going to be roundly criticized/mocked for being too easy for the younger males that still make up a majority of the Army. To preempt that inevitable criticism, there is a PR campaign to convince everyone how "tough" the test is before the standards are announced. They figure if they can seize control of the narrative that it is a "tough" test, the criticism when the standards ultimately are revealed will be more muted.

I think it's incredible dumb, but amusing to watch from the outside. Probably would be more amusing if it wasn't something that might implicate American lives.

Their best bet is probably to go with different standards based on MOS. That way they won't be directly stating that young men have different standards than others, but any infantry/artillery/front-line personnel (who just so happen to be young men) will have higher standards.

It's even justifiable, since you don't need an accountant or supply chain POG to be in the same physical condition as a grunt.
 
Everyone drink one for Navy call signs. Going AF style where everyone is Lazer, blazer, or Tazer.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...ocol-after-minority-aviators-report-bias.html

The head of naval aviation has directed the creation of a new process for approving and reviewing pilots' call signs after two African-American aviators at an F/A-18 Hornet training squadron in Virginia filed complaints alleging racial bias in the unit, from which they said they were unfairly dismissed.
 
Everyone drink one for Navy call signs. Going AF style where everyone is Lazer, blazer, or Tazer.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...ocol-after-minority-aviators-report-bias.html

Other minority pilots in the squadron also gave evidence of race influencing call signs. Another pilot, a lieutenant commander, said he also received the call sign "Radio" at his first squadron in the fleet, but later had it changed to "MC," short for "MC Hammer," in reference to a childhood nickname.

Uh...are call signs with ethnic connotations okay, or not?

Mountain out of a molehill, and I wasn't an aviator so I don't know the culture. But the truth is that if you over-sanitize the military, you're going to end up losing quite a bit of what makes the military enjoyable for a lot of people. Awful lot of history of "soldier's humor" going back a couple thousand years.
 
Other minority pilots in the squadron also gave evidence of race influencing call signs. Another pilot, a lieutenant commander, said he also received the call sign "Radio" at his first squadron in the fleet, but later had it changed to "MC," short for "MC Hammer," in reference to a childhood nickname.

Uh...are call signs with ethnic connotations okay, or not?

Mountain out of a molehill, and I wasn't an aviator so I don't know the culture. But the truth is that if you over-sanitize the military, you're going to end up losing quite a bit of what makes the military enjoyable for a lot of people. Awful lot of history of "soldier's humor" going back a couple thousand years.
Yep. And it'll be real interesting if the white male aviators complain for shots and gigs- the mayo's, oompah's, wej's (Jew spelled backwards), and a host of others complain because it's about being albino, short, or cheap, or whatever else. We'll be stuck with acronyms no one fucking knows and play on last names- "Tits" McGee, "Bangs" Guyes, "Publc" Hair (lowercase "L" there) (last names have been changed but get the point across).
 
Other minority pilots in the squadron also gave evidence of race influencing call signs. Another pilot, a lieutenant commander, said he also received the call sign "Radio" at his first squadron in the fleet, but later had it changed to "MC," short for "MC Hammer," in reference to a childhood nickname.

Uh...are call signs with ethnic connotations okay, or not?

Mountain out of a molehill, and I wasn't an aviator so I don't know the culture. But the truth is that if you over-sanitize the military, you're going to end up losing quite a bit of what makes the military enjoyable for a lot of people. Awful lot of history of "soldier's humor" going back a couple thousand years.

Seems like their "solution" is yet another example of flag officer over-correction.
 
Pretty cool that Bletchley Park is live streaming decrypted German messages on D-Day. The confusion is hilarious and unnerving. And also the warning to German warships to "not leave port," in the face of the biggest armada known to man.

 
Just as a correction, Gudin was a friend to Napoleon, one of the very few.

However, Napoleon's favorite general was his closest friend Marechal Jean Lannes. @The Human Q-Tip @jking948


Mystery of Napoleon's Missing General Solved in Russian Discovery

3YOjX4e.jpg



Napoleon's favourite general has been formally identified after DNA tests on a one-legged skeleton found under a dance floor in western Russia.

Analysis confirmed that the bones belonged to Charles-Etienne Gudin, French archaeologists say.

Gudin, aged 44, was hit by a cannonball near the city of Smolensk during the French invasion of Russia in 1812. He had to have his leg amputated and died three days later from gangrene. His heart was taken back to France.

The skeleton was discovered in July in a wooden coffin in a park beneath building foundations by a team of French and Russian archaeologists.

What did French archaeologists say?
The search for Gudin's remains began in May and was led by Pierre Malinowski, a historian with support from the Kremlin. This week he said that DNA tests from the remains found in Russia matched those of Pierre-César Gudin, Charles-Etienne Gudin's brother and also a Napoleonic general.

"The DNA fits 100%," Mr Malinowski told France's France Bleu broadcaster. "There is no longer any doubt."

At the time of his death on 22 August 1812, the French army removed Gudin's heart and buried it in a chapel in Paris' Père Lachaise cemetery. Researchers used the memoirs of Louis-Nicolas Davout, another French general of the Napoleonic era, who organised Gudin's funeral and described the location. They then followed another witness account, which directed them to the coffin.

Who was General Gudin?

tZGRoGM.jpg


An aristocrat by birth, Gudin was a veteran of both the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars.

He attended the same military school as Napoleon Bonaparte, and is believed to have been one of the French emperor's favourite generals.

A bust of his likeness resides in the Palace of Versailles, his name is inscribed on the Arc de Triomphe monument in Paris and he also has a street in the French capital named after him.

What about Napoleon's invasion of Russia?
The military campaign ended in a disastrous retreat from Moscow in 1812.

Napoleon's Grande Armée (Great Army) of 400,000 men was thought to be unbeatable and he himself had anticipated a rapid victory.

But having initially captured Moscow after the Russian army withdrew during a harsh winter, the emperor then realised he too had to turn back.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50329041

In a letter in which he vowed to blow up the Kremlin, Napoleon exposed his frustration at the campaign, with his army ravaged by disease, cold and hunger: "My cavalry is in tatters, a lot of horses are dying."
 
Still haven't seen 1917.

For those that have, did you learn anything new about WWI?

I think the Eastern Front needs more attention. While the Western Front was simple murder, crazy things were going on in the East.

Like Romania declaring war and immediately admitting they've made a huge mistake, only to be saved in the very nick of time.

The Romanian Campaign Plan (The "Z" Hypothesis) consisted in attacking Austria-Hungary in Transylvania, while defending Southern Dobruja and Giurgiu from Bulgaria in the south. Despite initial successes in Transylvania, after German divisions started aiding Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria, the Romanian forces (aided by Russia) suffered massive setbacks, and by the end of 1916 out of the territory of the Romanian Old Kingdom only Western Moldavia remained under the control of the Romanian and Russian armies.

After several defensive victories in 1917 at Mărăști, Mărășești and Oituz, with Russia's withdrawal from the war following the October Revolution, Romania, almost completely surrounded by the Central Powers, was also forced to drop out of the war, it signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918. The parliament signed the treaty, however King Ferdinand refused to sign it hoping for an Allied victory on the western front. On 10 November 1918, just one day before the German armistice and after all the other Central Powers had already capitulated, Romania re-entered the war after the successful Allied advances on the Macedonian front.


l9CUpGu.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania_during_World_War_I
 
Still haven't seen 1917.

For those that have, did you learn anything new about WWI?

I think the Eastern Front needs more attention. While the Western Front was simple murder, crazy things were going on in the East.

Like Romania declaring war and immediately admitting they've made a huge mistake, only to be saved in the very nick of time.

The Romanian Campaign Plan (The "Z" Hypothesis) consisted in attacking Austria-Hungary in Transylvania, while defending Southern Dobruja and Giurgiu from Bulgaria in the south. Despite initial successes in Transylvania, after German divisions started aiding Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria, the Romanian forces (aided by Russia) suffered massive setbacks, and by the end of 1916 out of the territory of the Romanian Old Kingdom only Western Moldavia remained under the control of the Romanian and Russian armies.

After several defensive victories in 1917 at Mărăști, Mărășești and Oituz, with Russia's withdrawal from the war following the October Revolution, Romania, almost completely surrounded by the Central Powers, was also forced to drop out of the war, it signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918. The parliament signed the treaty, however King Ferdinand refused to sign it hoping for an Allied victory on the western front. On 10 November 1918, just one day before the German armistice and after all the other Central Powers had already capitulated, Romania re-entered the war after the successful Allied advances on the Macedonian front.


l9CUpGu.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania_during_World_War_I

I'm curious too, I've seen so much on WWII, but WWI; I have a lot of room to learn on and this movie looks amazing. If it's educational on the same level, that's just all the better.
 
I'm curious too, I've seen so much on WWII, but WWI; I have a lot of room to learn on and this movie looks amazing. If it's educational on the same level, that's just all the better.

Dan Carlin's Hardcore History podcast has a 6 parter on WW1. It's probably pushing 20 hours in total, and it still admittedly glosses over so much. I'm in the same boat that I only had a high level understanding of WW1, and I learned so much from it.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top