-Akronite-
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Messages
- 10,993
- Reaction score
- 14,439
- Points
- 123
Much of the new mythos in the prequels adds little, detracts from the original story, or is just dumb. Pod-racing was cool. Darth Maul looks cool but is literally just evil looking bad guy the character. Did we need a fat guy in a 50s diner? Or midichlorians? Or a bunch of battles between clones and robots that mean nothing?
The lightsaber duels in the prequels are also overrated. Mostly sterile, over choreographed fanboy shit.
There wasn’t much to the dueling in this new trilogy, but at least they spent less time spamming the lightsaber button. They still haven’t figured out how to make the duels have weight like the original trilogy. The Obi-Wan v Anakin fight tried to have something going on but failed to land because we knew how it would end and they go to ridiculous lengths to make it “epic.” The last two movies barely tried to have duels in the traditional sense. While the specific powers Rey had bothered me, at least TFA built up to the moment when she Force pulled the saber to herself.
All three of the new movies are superior to all of the prequels IMO, but I’m gonna rewatch the prequels and see if my mind changes at all.
Edit: Something dumb from the prequels AND sequels? The overuse of the blast shield helmet/shooty ball as apparently the only training instrument for Jedi in the entire universe. COME UP WITH SOMETHING NEW! As Plinkett spells out in his reviews, it originally felt like an improvised exercise from Obi-Wan, not some officially licenses Jedi Council bullshit. A perfect example of how over-reliant new movies are on old imagery.
EDIT2: Re-watched Phantom Menace and Clones and wow... Just horrendous. TROS is a clusterfuck, but at least they feel like competently made movies with genuine attempts at emotion. It was so bad and I even got high just to make them better, still awful. Revenge of the Sith has gotten the most post-sequel rehab, but I doubt it holds up any better. Honestly, going back to the prequels only reinforced how I felt about them. Needed to re-watch Empire to get the bad taste out of my mouth.
The lightsaber duels in the prequels are also overrated. Mostly sterile, over choreographed fanboy shit.
There wasn’t much to the dueling in this new trilogy, but at least they spent less time spamming the lightsaber button. They still haven’t figured out how to make the duels have weight like the original trilogy. The Obi-Wan v Anakin fight tried to have something going on but failed to land because we knew how it would end and they go to ridiculous lengths to make it “epic.” The last two movies barely tried to have duels in the traditional sense. While the specific powers Rey had bothered me, at least TFA built up to the moment when she Force pulled the saber to herself.
All three of the new movies are superior to all of the prequels IMO, but I’m gonna rewatch the prequels and see if my mind changes at all.
Edit: Something dumb from the prequels AND sequels? The overuse of the blast shield helmet/shooty ball as apparently the only training instrument for Jedi in the entire universe. COME UP WITH SOMETHING NEW! As Plinkett spells out in his reviews, it originally felt like an improvised exercise from Obi-Wan, not some officially licenses Jedi Council bullshit. A perfect example of how over-reliant new movies are on old imagery.
EDIT2: Re-watched Phantom Menace and Clones and wow... Just horrendous. TROS is a clusterfuck, but at least they feel like competently made movies with genuine attempts at emotion. It was so bad and I even got high just to make them better, still awful. Revenge of the Sith has gotten the most post-sequel rehab, but I doubt it holds up any better. Honestly, going back to the prequels only reinforced how I felt about them. Needed to re-watch Empire to get the bad taste out of my mouth.
Last edited: