shoes22
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 28,311
- Reaction score
- 38,633
- Points
- 148
Yes. If Baker and Keenum go down, they were saying he’d be next on the list.Odell is the emergency QB today? Did romo just say that?
Yes. If Baker and Keenum go down, they were saying he’d be next on the list.Odell is the emergency QB today? Did romo just say that?
Yes. If Baker and Keenum go down, they were saying he’d be next on the list.
Keenum time. Use the excuse because of bakers injury.
Who gives a fuck if benching him now ends his Browns career. If a QB is playing bad enough where benching him is in the discussion then his feelings about it are irrelevant. Play better and it won’t be a discussion.
You don't get it.
Case Keenum is not better than Baker Mayfield. He's a journeyman backup who has graded out as one of the worst starting QB's in football when he's been tasked to be a starter. He's also 32 years old and firmly is what he is at this point.
However unlikely it is, there's the possibility that still exists given his age and the lack of stability in his career that Mayfield *could* improve as a QB. The Browns need to find that out.
Making the switch to the backup who we absolutely positively know isn't the guy because we're pissed off that young starter isn't as good as we all hoped certainly isn't the solution.
I'm just saying...we get the ball to start the second half and could possibly cut the lead back to 10. Anything could happen then. Not saying I think it'll happen...but it's still a possibility to make this game interesting.